she s clearly not incapacitated. she s on to her. she s making millions for people, but they re forcing iuds inside her body and won t let her get married. it doesn t make any sense, you know it, everybody else knows it, but the lawyers are just billing by the hour year after year after year. let me make some sense of it legally and how it all pertains to us. you can t go into court and get something unless you ask for it. britney talking about ending her conservatorship when that wasn t even in the petition is like walking into mcdonald s and asking for filet mignon. it ain t on the menu. jesse: she didn t even know what was on the menu, she s an innocent naive girl, she s a country girl jesse: i don t disagree with you. i director through this and didn t even tell her she could end the thing. it s interesting though how much you claim to know without really being there and knowing. there is so much that we don t know what s going on, and i m not saying that that justifies k
grayson intends to file a complaint, a legal brief on this issue. and our it will be immediately dismissed. not because it s nonsense but because they won t have the legal standing. if he s president, you could file it and i think the supreme court would quickly dismiss it. you can t go into court and ask about a theoretical situation that doesn t exist. i agree with you. i have to leave it there. thanks to both of you. still to come in the newsroom, north korea invites cnn to tour its new science center. so, what did the rogue nation want to show us? i drive a golf ball. i drive to the hoop. i drive a racecar. i have a driver. his name is carl. but that s not what we all have in common. we talked to our doctors about treatment with xarelto®. xarelto® is proven to treat and help reduce the risk of dvt and pe blood clots.
will be there as well to see if we can t move it forward. a lot of the family members, i can imagine, say i don t care about the money, i don t just want money, i want change. i wonder if there s a legal recourse taken to make things change like the real-time tracking of the planes that has been asked for for the last five years since air france 447 went down. the family groups are depending on the political situation, in the country where they re going to try to do this in the u.s. after the colgan air 2009 accident the family group went to congress lobbied congress got the law changed that required pilots coming into the industry to have much more experience. okay. so they could. but they had to get the law changed. they can t go into court and require the faa to do something because that s not in our legal system. the most effective way to lobby congress to get this changed. that s right. good to have you on the program. david, to you as well. next israeli prim
just as the decision of the federal judge that you had attorney general cuccinelli on from virginia a couple nights ago in that state strengths my case and makes us that much stronger. this is a multi-pronged effort across many states. i want to encourage those living in the other 49 states, press your state lawmakers to pass the same law if you have referendum in your constitution like we do in missouri like something like half the stays do, insist that it be put to a vote of people. this will be something that our federal masters cannot ignore. greta: it has the momentum going forward. you said it is good for your lawsuit in missouri, it is a momentum not a factual predicate to push your argument forward. you can t go into court and say based on this referendum we are now a stronger position to the judge. it is interesting. it shows that the people of miss it shows what the people of missouri want but
you don t have to state an opinion, i will say that roger and eric holder usually don t agree. he says i recognize the political and legal danger of just stiffing the guy. i turn to you on the law, karen. what is is legal danger in this context when you re a subject of a probe and you say i can t speak based on the fifth? well, i mean, certainly it s happened in many cases, you say i can t speak based on the fifth and then the probe goes forward gathering all the other evidence. but you can t go into court and say this is what i wanted to say and they didn t want to listen to me. and especially when you re talking about targeting the president of the united states. you want to give them an opportunity to answer the questions that they have, but the probe will continue whether he says, you know, i m willing to speak or not. but, you know, in some sense you lose the high ground of saying, well, i really wanted to tell