It without any purpose. How would you personally start a conversation with such a person who enjoys who travel in seeing human suffering they have been such people throughout history and terrible terrible infix if you think of the grief and the trauma inflicted not just on the mothers and fathers but the children as well its on forgivable and nobody can condone that but what im saying is its not new i think its time now in this century to move out of Twentieth Century methods of using force against force and find out how to use an advanced consciousness to deal with people who are clearly working from a very base consciousness. Well im not sure their consciousness is based one because theyre very deliberate very deliberate in their intention to harm i just again im sorry to be revolving. Around the same question but. If you if you consider the experiences of some of these even we women theyre just mind boggling you cant imagine that a human being for whatever purpose would be capable o
Minutes later i still had what we call an english goose bumps and i asked myself why what is this and eventually i figured out it was the sheer energy of his integrity and i received that bodily so this was clearly a man that you couldnt push around and who would not back down on what he believed but all of that were standing up to institutional violence an individual against the a process machinery of the state we still happens today but i think the most cruel forms of violence these day the associated with nonstate actors who not only rely on violence for practical purposes they strata shies it do you really think that the approach of Mahatma Gandhi could be affective with groups like the Islamic State i believe that any good. Group one can talk to its a question of finding the right moment in their campaigns and finding the right people to do it because what matters is the approach of the individuals or the group who are conducting that dialogue what im telling you is that when you
Right now its being tested and the test are going quite well and were going to interview the cofounder of Lightning Network which is a stark hopefully well interview her soon but regarding this means of Exchange First says store value yes the markets decided investors decided in twenty seventeen that. It would not be necessarily means of exchange at this moment its going to be a store of value back in two thousand and fourteen when stripe first started in twenty fourteen the San Francisco based firm became the first major Payments Company to support big claim payments at the time stripe hoped would become a way for people in places with low Credit Card Penetration are prohibited lehi credit card fees to do transactions online but it said the Virtual Currency was now better suited to being an asset than being a means of exchange so back in two thousand and fourteen when you know of course were covering it here. Kaiser report. We use it as a means of Exchange Many people you know use it
Upcoming in korea or is it too late anyway even if they do change their mind. I think they should but probably they would not because i mean all the affair has a political dimension my interpretation since the beginning is that there is clearly a campaign against russia and against president putin and of course course its also i mean to somehow discredit russia so if now they will accept the russian utterances they will provoke a political storm and made a lot of these a point probably to decide not to accept the atlas also because early enough is quite late you can fill in the speech start next week. Right but a telephone or Italian Journalist that thanks for giving us your insight into this story here knotty. Over to the United States now and a public clash between the white house and the f. B. I. Is seen in the u. S. President accuse the bureau of lacking investigative process this comes as donald trump looks set to release a classified memo alleging the f. B. I. Abused its surveill
Administration however the underlying tone of it is a throwback to. The you know the cold war what President Trump declared in his state of the Union Address was that we need to ramp up our Nuclear Capability and make us so strong that nobody would be even willing to engage in or even trying to gauge what the United States because we have a Strong Nuclear arsenal that actually is really dangerous thinking and its almost like into amateur hour so the u. S. Strategy says Nuclear Weapons may be used in case of a non Nuclear Attack but other Nuclear Powers for example china pledge no first use of Nuclear Weapons while russias doctrine says they can only be used for if attacked by weapons of mass destruction so why does washington insist on maintaining the right to use nuclear offensively. Well a moment ago i said this is amateur hour and i believe thats the case i dont think the president appreciates all of the strategy that has brought the United States russia and china to the point of ha