Of the most dangerous temperatures we have seen in decades. The temperature dropped below zero. It is expect today bring bone chilling cold. Pamela gardener is here. Carroll said my car will not start this morning. So sorry. Too. My car was actually in the degrees. It growled a little built and then it started. I am keeping my fingers crossed for later. We have temperatures below zero. It is 9 below in boston at this time. This is the coldest air we have been experiencing across the area since 1954. It is 15 below in wooster. We have already broken the records here. 3 below set in 1934 actually. Windchill temperatures feeling more like 30 to 45 degrees below zero. For the north and west. We still have a windchill warning out today. Afternoon the winds slowly subside just a bit. It will still be bitter with a high of 9 degrees this valentines day but it is not going to be warning criteria or anything like that. Soon there is a warmup on the way. When well see 20s and 50s coming up. The
Groups. To readrance gets ready new flights to iran, female flight attendants are protesting a decision that would force them to where veils once they land. , we will be taking a closer look at the panama law firm at the center of the Panama Papers leak. How they help the rich and in taxl hide their money havens. And the winner of the hong kong Film Festival is almost completely snubbed by the media in china. First, our top story live from paris. We will start with whats being called the biggest leak in journalism history. The Panama Papers. They have already whipped up a storm of controversy over offshore accounts and tax invasions for the rich and famous. Thousands of names are on the list including the Prime Ministers of iceland and pakistan, the president of ukraine, and the king of saudi arabia. Ties to Vladimir Putin were also detailed as well as star jackie chan and footballer leonel messy. Several Media Outlets around the world have and working on the documents including the fr
Surprised the asked the question but yes, we are patriots. And one of the things were patriotic about is the nature of the democracy and the nature of the free press and the fact that one can in this country discuss and report these things. There is nothing the guardian published that is endangering people in the way that you it isnt only about what you have published. Its about what you have communicated. That is what amount or cannot do a criminal offense. You have caused the committee geisha of secret documents would classify things as secret and top secret in this country for a reason, not to hide them from the guardian by to hide them from those who are out to harm us. You have communicated those documents. Do you have a question . If you knew about the enigma code in world war ii would you provide that information to the nazis . That is a red herring. I think most journalists can make a distinction between the kind of thing to talk about, the enigma code or travel log, this is ve
That we can speak our only much and you will get translation our english, but that colleagues here do not get any translation, or do you . No. But you should get translation into ingush so signal if there is a problem. Im also going to ask colleagues and our guests to be as brief and concise as possible and to allow for maximum number of questions. We will have one question, one i will ask time, and everybody to be very, very concise. Listen toll, we will the men from the dsnd group. Greenwald formr. Being with us today. Can i begin with where you finish, the source, Edward Snowden . In my report, i am going to be talking about whistleblower protection. Yesterday we saw the Congressional Committee that by mike rogers, and they rejected snowden asion of mr. A whistleblower. What is your view of that . By rejecting that definition, they are seeing him as a felon. Simple question, what is your view of that . Secondly, on the federal court gment, which he welcomed, which you welcomed, agai
Collecting that information and only permitted to use that information for a very narrow purpose. Theyre not intended to use it for secondary purposes unrelated to that primary purpose of collection. Its very narrow. So privacy is about freedom and your ability to largely go about your activities as you wish subject to limited exceptions and subject, of course, to law enforcement. I agree with you. Asking these questions. Let me ask you, the limited purposes, do you feel youre using that information for purposes for which is not intended today, right now, say in the janes department . I dont know it personally. How about security in general. Homeland security, i worked with them. Theres no issue. But i am going to point to the obvious which is to the nsa revelations that have come out. Not just nsa, my country in canada, the csc, that kind of thing. That has revealed the massive scale of information about lawabiding citizens that are being collected. Let me point you and if you want th