Ask the committee to support this legislation and urge the board of supervisors to pass it. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker will will be sonia. [calling speaker names] good afternoon. My name is sonia and i live here in beautiful San Francisco. Allow me to start by saying i am not entirely against development in our neighborhood. However it is quite irritating and frustrating to see developers change the face of the neighborhood without considering the interest of the community. People who move to Corona Heights have chosen the neighborhood due to a compelling characteristics. We not only value the diversity of People Living here we also love the gardens that are home to a broad variety of plants flowers and trees and animals. Building massive Single Family homes in Corona Heights and korbet heights must stop and letting the developers to profit at the expense of the community would be a mistake. We cannot risk that the neighborhoods become a concrete jungle and not allow
Square feet. The legislation would generally require a rear yard open space of at least 45 of the lot area and the current requirement under the planning coat. The exist tg requirement is of a 45foot 45 of a lot area in terms of rear yard. However, there are loopholes that have under mined that clearly stated requirement, and you so this would tighten up that requirement given the importance of rear yards in many of our neighborhoods. There have been some concerns expressed as i indicated that this legislation is somehow antihousing and that is not the case. The legislation does nothing to reduce density in this neighborhood. This neighborhood is generally rh2 or rh3. The legislation doesnt reduce the number of units that can be placed on a lot. In fact much of this neighborhood is encompassed by the castro legislation they authord and we passed last year that effective increases the zoning in the area that allows people to add an additional in law unit within the existing envelope of