that is inconsistent with the constitution, the supreme law controls. mainly the constitution controls over a contrary statute. that s, of course, also discussed in federalist 78 as well of what s the supreme law of the land and the constitution is the supreme law. again, precedent, historical practice. subsequent to the passing of the text. we see that in establishment clause cases. the court will look, what s the historical practice and precedent is rooted in arl iii. those things all go into it. the words original public meaning are an important part of constitutional interpretation, has been, i think, throughout. let s suppose congress, making us slightlily less popular than castro raul and
inconsistent with the constitution, the supreme law controls, namely the constitution controls over contrary statute and that is also, discussed in federalist 78, as well, of what s the supreme law of the land in the constitution in the supreme law. again, precedent, historical practice, subsequent to passing of the tax, we see for example in establishment clause cases, court look at tax, historical practice and rooted in article three, those thing guess into it, the words, original public meaning, are important part of constitutional interpretation and has been i think throughout. let s suppose congress in infinite wisdom, with approval rating that ranges between 9 and 11%, making us slightly less popular than raul castro and more than iris gaining on us,
inconsistent with the constitution, the supreme law controls, namely, the constitution controls over a contrary statute. that s of course discussed in federalist 78 as well of what is the supreme law of the land and the constitution is the supreme law. again precedent, historical practice subsequent to the passing of the text. we see that for example on establishment clause cases. the court will often look at the text. what is the historical practice. and precedent, which is rooted in article 3, those things go in it. the words, the original public meaning are an important part of constitutional interpretation and has been, i think, throughout. let s suppose congress in its infinite wisdom with it s approval rating that ranges between 9% and 11%, making us slightly less popular than raul castro in america and slightly