A winning performance the south american put country put to pass to australia to wrap up a group c. With a back. Way of iraq thanks for your Company Everyone multiple has said it will allow a rescue ship carrying hundreds of migrants to dock having previously joined italy in turning it over way the chance the change of heart comes after several European Countries agree to take a share of the two hundred Asylum Seekers on board the german ship called the lifeline has been waiting for permission to dock for days. These migrant odyssey might soon be over france and italy have negotiated with multi to let the rescue ship lifeline dokken. But the crew hasnt received official confirmation yet the ship has been stuck at seasons last thursday with two hundred thirty three migrants on Board Institution going through the door through and going to have a tough course its terrible to be on a ship for days. It can give way to win the way. You can get seasick when all you want to do is reach safety.
the supreme court ruled to uphold his controversial travel ban. the order upheld is a far cry from the one ruled out amid the confusion and turmoil of theear. justice correspondent pete williams has more on this. reporter: after a year and a half of confusion, chaos at u.s. airports for those caught up in the first travel ban. repeated smack downs from the courts and the white house, the court says the latest one can stand. the supreme court upholds trump travel ban, president trump tweeted, led by john roberts, they said it is legal as presidential act to protect national security. an important difference that this one was based on review of how well more than 200 countries do in fighting terrorism and verifying identity of visa applicants. it restricts travel from five muslim countries. iran, libya, somalia, syria, yemen. the ruling notes the president s
family separation executive order was drawn up in the style of version one or version three of the travel ban? what is going to happen when that goes to court? as far as the zero tolerance policy, enforcing at the border, i ve been on the record that it is critical to dhs wasn t ready to implement. let me just the president of the united states has officially reacted to the supreme court 5-4 decision on twitter, of course. the president writes this. in all caps. supreme court upholds trump travel ban, wow. see it right there. wow with an exclamation point. go ahead. i think i think we should separate ourselves from the reality of the the reality tv show we re dealing with, which is that donald trump acts like the supreme court is a thumbs up or thumbs down movie determination or something like that, what happened in this case is a very divisive case, his
any serious argument to the contrary. remember, the first two attempts were, to put it mildly, a mess, both legally and politically. the president s twitter feed suggesting he might also be a bit surprised. supreme court upholds trump travel ban. wow! give us the white house reaction as we wait to hear from the president himself, jeff zeleny. those are the president s view, i m told, perfectly. he was watching this unfold on television. members of the white house counsel s office was explaining the ruling and the word that came out immediately was vindication. that was an official statement the white house released from the president a short time ago. let s take a look at it because it s quite interesting in its language what it chooses to say. today s supreme court ruling is a tremendous victory for the american people and the constitution. the supreme court has upheld the clear authority of the president to defend the national security of the united states. in this era of worldwide
the united states and so the administration is in some way violating its own policy and i think that is where they ll try and focus efforts to chip away at elements of the travel ban. as soon as the decision, jackie, was reached, the president wasted no time tweeting this. supreme court upholds trump travel ban all in caps and then said wow. he wasn t as enthusiastic about his own 3.0 travel ban last summer when he tweeted that justice department issued a stay with the original travel ban, not the watered down politically correct version they submitted to the supreme court. what changed? you ask you asked raj shah this question and there is a reason he didn t answer it. because a win is a win for president trump. that is all he wants. he wins a w. next to his name. that is simple. he s not a details guy. i m sure if you press him about what the details of the plan were, especially with the differences between the two the 2.0 and the 3.0. he won t be able to tell you. all that m