team. the four times indicted former president is in the middle of a very complicated legal situation as he faces 91 criminal charges related to his conduct before, during, and after his presidency. a civil fraud trial in new york for threatens the future of his real estate empire while a different civil it hold him liable of sexually abusing the writer and columnist, e. jean carroll. carol is also suing trump in a second defamation trial over commentshahe made on cnn in may about her. late last night, donald trump filed a brief to the d.c. court of appeals, continuing to assert that he s immune from prosecution for actually committed while president, specifically for his role in questioning the results of the 2020 election. of course, the allegation is not that a question the results of the 2020 election, anyone is entitled to do that, it s that he did something to try and overcome those results. the immunity argument is the argument he s making in the hopes of getting jack
breaking news night. tonight america is seeing ultimate in election interference as four unelected state judges all appointed by democratic governors have ruled donald trump must be kept off next year s presidential ballot. colorado supreme court wrote that we conclude because president trump is disqualified from holding office of president, it would be wrongful act under election code for secretary to list trump as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot. the secretary may not list president trump s name on the 2024 presidential ballot nor count any write-in votes cast for him. the suit focused on section three aimed at barring confederates from federal office who engaged in insurrectionist behavior or rebellion. case was spearheaded by citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington. that is great. the trump legal team will need to move fast and appeal to supreme court of the united states. the decision of the colorado supreme court and stayed or delayed until j
should donald trump be treated like the rest of us or does his position as idol of the maga movement preclude him from something so silly as the law? you can guess the answer his lawyers are hoping for today, requesting a hearing in front of the full united states court of appeals in washington, d.c. specifically they are asking the court to narrow or throw out the gag order imposed on trump in the criminal case having to do with his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, and they would like a hold on the order while an appeal is considered. you will remember trial judge tanya chutkan first imposed the restriction on trump in october, holding him to the same standards as any other criminal defendant, that he shouldn t publicly attack witnesses, specific prosecutors or court staff members. two weeks ago a three-judge panel upheld that basic idea, although it narrowed the order s scope allowing trump a bit more latitude, particularly to talk about the special pro
conservatives had second thoughts, and what the leaked draft did to any hope for compromise. now a year and a half later, the high court is on clean up duty. agreeing to take on the first major complication from its ruling, this one on the abortion pill. mifepristone. the decision, which could effectively ban the pill nationwide should come next june, meaning the court will keep abortion front and center in the summer before the presidential election. an issue that has repeatedly proven to boost democrats, especially as republicans are still struggling to figure out what to say on it. just listen to senators ted cruz and john cornyn on this week s decision by the texas supreme court to deny kate cox an abortion. senator, are you supportive of the texas supreme court s ruling in the kate cox case that prevented her from getting an abortion after she learned her fetus was not viable. call the press office. i have for two days, and i haven t received an answer. are you w
disney world in announcing that you re going to run for president. ron desantis, enjoy that ride. alex, i ve got a problem little struggle through here in this program. it is similar to the problem that i have with putting the words fox and news anywhere near each other. if i do, i feel like i m telling a lie. it s just not true. there is a congressional committee now where i cannot bring myself to say the name of the committee and i have to report on it tonight. i bet i know each committee you re talking about. don t say it, i can t take it. it is maybe chaired by somebody call it s fair to call him the jordan committee. the jim jordan committee, the closest i can come to. i simply can t use the name of the committee. i ll explain why in this segment as i report on the committee, while i dare not say his name. and don t forget, lawrence, i know you love the parliamentarian details of the u.s. congress, subcommittee. technically a subcommittee. not even an act