so i think the republican party again nationally is in a quagmire and the state party may enjoy this thing but i don t think they re looking at the overall impact to have on republicans odds to regain control of the house and maybe even the senate for that matter. two things. what makes you think that the supreme court doesn t want to be involved? it seems to be sent that way. because to challenge the law it could go all the way up if not beyond the texas supreme court to the federal supreme court. to the supreme court itself. to overturn the texas law, a. why not speak out? if this isn t the narrative for the party come the midterms why not speak up? look. i don t think they want to take the risk of angering a very important part of the republican base and that s evangelicals. that s been a part of republican voters for 40, 50 years now so i
i am here. it s good to have you here. you were the former policy adviser entrenched in all of this. what are your thoughts of this decision? the supreme court does not want to weigh in on this. and i think challenges are dead. they are not interested in relitigating this. you have a majority that s taking every opportunity to say no. the aca is law of the land. we re really not going to be interested in turning it over. we should remember, when president biden came in and extended the open enrollment period, we ve had over 1 million new enrollees into the accordable care act exchanges, signaling that without a mandate, lots of people want health insurance. and this is a vehicle for them to get health insurance. i think the supreme court doesn t want to upset that apple cart. you may remember that samuel
baby isn t a baby or it s born, it can be terminated. life can be terminated. they re stunned that there are millions of young people and women who believe that. that s what we see for the march for life. they say i ve seen the sonogram. my brothers and sisters say it s changed my feelings. it s interesting to see the younger generation feels that way. let s argue anything. you need to be able to argue both sides of it. laura: there s another opinion on this. shannon: it was a one-sided class. laura: nothing has changed in the class of media. a lot of people are saying it s not smart by alabama because it will get struck down by the state court and then the supreme court doesn t want to go near this. what are your thoughts? shannon: et s interesting. you know how it works. you have to get four votes behind closed doors to get it to the forefront. it s such a huge leap. more cases are likely to get to the supreme court. they re chipping away at things, indiana has provisions y
disagreed with the prevailing elite view that, you know, a baby isn t a baby or it s born it can be terminated. life can be terminated. they re stunned that there are millions of young people and women who believe that. that s what we see for the march for life. they say i ve seen the sonogram. my brothers and sisters say it s changed myfe feelings. it s interesting to see the younger generation feels that way. let s argue anything. you need to be able to argue both sides of it. laura: there s another opinion on this. shannon: it was a one-sided oclass. laura: nothing has changed in the class of media. a lot of people are saying it s not smart by alabama because it will get struck down by the state court and then the supreme court doesn t want to go near this. what are your thoughts? shannon: et s interesting. you know how it works. you have to get four votes behind closed doors toin get ito the forefront. it s such a huge leap. more cases are likely to get to the supreme cou
against gay s, lesbians and by sexuals. that s not what the folks voted on and correct me if i am wrong, ladies, like you always do. the coloradoens voted on we don t want to give personal treatment to gays. exactly. bill: they turned it around saying if you allow that law to stand then you will be discriminating. doesn t make any sense to me. dissenting opinion by scalia describing bill billing no preferential treatment for one group and the supreme court says oh you can t single out one group. reverse argument. one group. then you could say no preferential treatment for native americans and then go down. interesting here. kennedy was wrote the decision. he is and he will be swing vote. let s get to prop 8. california twice has said no to gay marriage. folks out there don t want it for many reasons. many different reasons. but now it seems to meet supreme court doesn t want to overturn that vote.