retrospective embarrassment. that is part of it. it is the fact they want to hide from the truth in the present and they want to have the option of saying if this is the new order, if suppressing misinformation becomes a new progressive virtue, the next time there is an emergency circumstance, they can pull that card to advance their political agenda. it is preserving the options. the next thing that happens, they suppress all over again because there is precedent. when rfk goes out and he says things that many people don t agree with, not everybody agrees with everything rfk jr. says. are the republicans trying to elevate him, to use and as a weapon against the democrats? the republican play should be simple. it is why i am in this race for u.s. president. we need to offer an affirmative
i think it s more than just the retrospective embarrassment, though i do thin jusk that s part of it. t it s the fact that they want to hide from the truth in the present. have and i think they want to have the option, jesse, of saying that if this is thofe new order if suppressing misinformation becomes a new progressive virtueorder, i, then the next te there s an emergency or so-called emergency circumstance ends, they canat still pull that card to advance iteir political wits about. so in a certain way, it s preserving the options. it s observing, preserving the question. okay. because the next thing that happens, they suppress thething all over again, because now there s precedent. when rfk goes out there and he says things that many people don t agree with, not everybody agrees with everything rfk jr saye witr are the republicans trying to elevate him, to use him as a weapon against the democrats? what s the republican play here? well, i think the republican place shoul
it s wrong. john: and gabby giffords. and steve scalise, too. john: you and james comer sent letters to elon musk and mark zuckerberg asking for documents relating to social media, said in part, committee republicans investigate whether u.s. government officials have participated in suppression and censorship of lawful speech, and that social media companies acted at the behest of officials. do you believe under the guise of suppressing misinformation and did so at the behest of the administration? a twitter executive was meeting with the fbi and homeland security and the director of national intelligence. for a private business to make its own rules about content moderation but apply equally across the board, not discriminating based on political affiliation. is entirely another when you