i think it s more than just the retrospective embarrassment, though i do thin jusk that s part of it. t it s the fact that they want to hide from the truth in the present. have and i think they want to have the option, jesse, of saying that if this is thofe new order if suppressing misinformation becomes a new progressive virtueorder, i, then the next te there s an emergency or so-called emergency circumstance ends, they canat still pull that card to advance iteir political wits about. so in a certain way, it s preserving the options. it s observing, preserving the question. okay. because the next thing that happens, they suppress thething all over again, because now there s precedent. when rfk goes out there and he says things that many people don t agree with, not everybody agrees with everything rfk jr saye witr are the republicans trying to elevate him, to use him as a weapon against the democrats? what s the republican play here? well, i think the republican place shoul
arrangement, right? democrats censor people like you, me, or rfk, jr.they s smear us, drag us throughg us the mud like they just did. and the ones who get rich off it are big corporations. . that s why rfk jr is a threatk r to the whole business model.demr democrats would rather have some, a guye joe biden who can t walk up the stairs and struggles to string a sentencewho ca stairs togethe. but that s not the point. he s not asking questions. they d rather idolize someone like fetterman, who needsproces a computer to process speech as long as he s not asking question hs. l plas they ll plaster his face all over time magazine. democrats used to be the party of kennedy, where you were encouragedbe to ask questions. you trusted no one. but now, when ted kennedy asks questions, it becomes noe. biggest nightmar the vague rama is a 20 24 presidential candidate. the vague lie to the w want to censor rfk jr.
well, somebody who is competing with rfk in some way i?n this ti election process and as somebody who has my own disagreementprocess, who hass wm on issues ranging from climate policy to affirmative action, i applaud his willingness to speak truths thatdoes the democratic party, his own party, does not want to hear. want tothey prefer a compliantp of the managerial class like, le joe biden, like john fetterman, as you noted. joe so body who actually going to challenge their orthodoxy. and the funny thing, jesse, is that the left going used to bevement the movement in this country that stood for free speech. t things have changed in the last couple of decades. now it appears to be more of to a conservative value. and so even though i disagree va on a number of policies, i did call him yesterday. i told him to keep up and stay strong ipolicies, i ton his fig i respect his willingness to speak hard truthshi. that s what i m doing in the republican primary as well. and i think our countrd
only answer. what are you afraid that he would say under oatht he todat you want to stop even the american people from havinge the opportunity to hear? i m not afraid of anything he would say. i just don t wanrtunity t to he. what do you say to people who are concerned that you were trying to censor rfk jrng t by trying to not let him come today? oh, that s not censorship.qu censorship would not being allowing someone to speaick k, e can speak. that doesn t give him necessarily the ability to have to do it in the halls of congress. trying to censor him today proved his point that he is being censor him. we were trying to make sure that he didn t cause more harm with his outrageous testimony. i don t think you want to bring bigots before the congress, but apparently that s par for the coursetly that with this ma. and by the way, that one representative from the islands you saw there, she was an epstein patsy.n pats go figure. two democrats questioning big tech, big pharmay.t