greg: will you do better at dating you keep those corn dogs waiting? if you make yourself exclusive? a brand-new, totally scientific study has settled it. playing hard to get does work after all. i guess that is why women love scott peterson. apparently faking disinterest really does attract mates, and it s much better than my strategy of faking a seizure so there is a chance of mouth-to-mouth. in an attempt to answer why there are still single, the researchers at the university of rochester concludes it is all about the thrill of the chase and your suitor being unsure the effects will be reciprocated. that is some great research. you could ve called my grandmother, she would ve told you you the same thing.
across our economy, really, in everything from pharma to cat food to caskets. what role do you think that congressional intent should play in the court s interpretation of the antitrust laws? and i say that because i think that we re dealing with some cases where justices have actually substituted their own ideologies for the intent of congress in originally passing the laws. and i think it was justice suitor who once said before this committee, we dealing with one of the most spectacular examples of delegation to the judiciary that our legal system knows, and he added this. certainly, a respect for legislative intent has got to be our anchor for interpretation. so, what role do you think congressional intent should play in the court s interpretation of the antitrust laws? thank you, senator.
companies like google and amazon and apple, but pharma to caskets. what role do you think congressional intent should play in the court and antitrust laws. i think we are dealing with some cases why justices have substituted their own ideologies for the intent of congress in originally passing the laws. and i think it was justice suitor who once said before this committee when we are dealing with antitrust laws we are dealing with one of the most spectacular examples of delegation to the judiciary the legal system knows, and he added this, certainly a respect for legislative intent has got to be our anchor for interpretation. the so what role do you think congressional intent should play in the court s interpretation of the antitrust laws?
and surprise us in many directions, and not as many surprises now. yeah, mark murray and i were talking about this this morning, justice gorsuch yeah, alito and thomas never really surprise. and they never will. and sotomayor doesn t surprise. she s an occasional surprise. yes, she is. small scale compared to hugo that s it, we don t have the perception the judiciary is a fair arbiter. i would agree. yeah, and also, too, though, there s no talking more on the right of this person is turning into a suitor where it s you are just left and we saw that problem with the federal society for better for worse. i would go back further to garland, and i would go back to
While sometimes gals go out to bars with the goal to meet a guy, that’s often not the case and the last thing they want to deal with is a persistent suitor who just won’t stop hitting on them no matter how much they resist. So, what do they do?