he s presidentially unfit and they can see that and know that. one last thing, they said terry mcauliffe would have run. had they only passed build back better suitor, drag our feet, didn t tell people what s in it. that would have been worse for them. they believe that this is the way forward. that s how you get out of inflation, when people can t afford every day the subsidies come up things we didn t ask for. sean: last word, jason chaffetz. they are too chicken to stand out in front. people like jon tester don t have a backbone to show where they are today. they are all rooting for joe manchin to take the lead on this one. sean: if they don t do it themselves, they have to hope that joe manchin does the hard work for them. joe manchin, he s saving the party from itself. it s going to be an interesting couple of weeks.
what it is that people are going to be hearing. so you ll be hearing a very rapid-fire oral argument. 35 minutes per side. there ll be three advocates total. one, the mississippi solicitor general will start the argument and have 35 minutes. then the challengers to the mississippi law and then the united states solicitor general, the top lawyer for the federal government. and they ll each have two minutes of uninterrupted time for the justices that they ll pause and listen. so that s like the opening statements, essentially? exactly. two minutes. that s new after covid. before, i would hope to get one line out, and normally, you wouldn t get that one line out before question, question, question. two minutes uninterrupted, then a scrum where any justice can ask a question. and you will see their questions piling on top of each other sometimes today. and are they are they kind of like is it like a civil discourse or is it intended to be more open-ended questions being l
book on this, joshua prayger, thank you very much for being on the show. good morning to you. good morning, thanks for having me. legal abortion has been the law of the land for 48 years now and this is one of the most significant cases. it is the most significant case to come before the court in 30 years. can you put this into context for us based on your long study of this issue? sure, you know, when roe was decided in 1973, it gave the pro-life movement a new core objective, and that was overturning roe. i think today there are two real key points to keep in mind. the first is that as you just noted, we ve been here before, 30 years ago in the case of planned parenthood v. casey, there was resignation on the part of the pro-choice movement. everyone sort of thought that roe was doomed. that s because there had just been two appointments by president bush, justice thomas and justice suitor. justice suitor was not only the