Postponing or continuing the item subject to the call of the chair. We can only communicate with her by mail. We generally do not get responses to requests. As a practical matter, i am not sure how we would get the things schedule between now and september. I do feel like, there is a competing interest to get this matter resolved that we have all addressed. And i think that the challenges coming up with the compromise and giving it to the call of the chair or something. But we could very well be in the same position at the next meeting where we dont have evidence of her meeting an accommodation and she is not here and then what . Which is why i think at least giving, or saying, look if you dont give us some proof, we are going to go forward, the next time whenever it is schedule, but if you dont have that, then i dont know how we would make our decision at the next meeting. My only suggestion is that we do it at a point by your date certain but not demand the proof. Yeah. I see. I unde
Requests, john, you mentioned that there is an increase on the Public Record requests and what do you account for that . Is that just seasonal . It is really hard to predict when they will come and when they will not. We have one record request last week that took two staffers, the better part of three days. To fill in. And then and then we had a second record request. And in the previous weeks. Anda say that it is seasonal, and it is just, there are so many different motivating factors behind them. Yeah. Thank you. Mr. Saint croix, willing terms of the file comparable to the terms that we had with them previously and i know that we previously gotten a good deal from them. And for the first time, since we have had the contract the actual dollar amount of the contract has increased and i think that the file has held it down low because we are San Francisco is the anchor tenant and i think that after 6 years, the costs have increased, and but we ammortized it over the life of the contrac
This report. The first section, number 7, discusses the filing of form 700. And some focus needs to be placed on the fact that the filing of such reports are done under the penalty of perjury, the city librarian failed to figure that out. And he also didnt seem to understand that finding such a statement is perjury, even when it is not done in front of the public official under oath. And i have to believe that someone as intelligent does not understand those matters and there must be many more City Employees who do not understand, and potentially a lot of other were filing and complaints with the ftpc against the members. And it is the same as mr. Herrera in similar amounts. In section ten is says that due to the records involved. And it has been side tracked from the regular duties end quote, under the sunshine ordinance and the San Francisco public records act. And responding to public records requests, they are among the regular duties of every City Employees. This mistakingly repre
Herrera in similar amounts. In section ten is says that due to the records involved. And it has been side tracked from the regular duties end quote, under the sunshine ordinance and the San Francisco public records act. And responding to public records requests, they are among the regular duties of every City Employees. This mistakingly represents this as something that they are being taken away from their duties. It is part of their duty and any City Employee who is asked for a record is a requirement and part of their job duties to provide a job response. And putting this in a report saying that they are taken away from the regular duties it is simply a ploy and the record request to something and it is a legitimate legal request from a citizen of San Francisco. And the control and the supervision or a record and not getting it. And it is my own experience after chasing him for two solid years and going through the City Attorneys Office and a petition that the supervisor of records t
Received in multiple years with no belief that this body would take any action, the speaker took the matter to a state agency. After multiple training called the multiple sunshine declarations and trainings in ethics rules and statements all under the penalty of perjury and that he took those trainings and then proceeded the year after year file annual statements with the fdpc form 700, and that all said that he got nothing. And he did those under penalty of perjury, now. His amended filings showed that thousands of dollars of such gifts and the Library Commission most recently and illegally statement and it was illegally produced and illegally revised and illegally approved and released it to the media from the lie brae on the stationary and did it all out of the site of the public and multiple and not only violating the sunshine ordinance but the brown act because they did not have enough courage to talk about what they wanted to say in a public, open meeting. And so what they did is