. we have an agreement with the justice department that they will give us access to the redacted portions of the mueller report and they have agreed to give us in priority order with us establishing the priority, the underlying evidence under the mueller report. moments ago chairman nadler breaking a little bit of news to get evidence from mueller. democrats are vowing much more aggressive efforts. republicans debuted their own witness at that very nadler hearing. john malcolm. by not making a judicial prosecutorial judgment with respect to the allegations, mr. mueller failed to fulfill that duty. the special counsel put the attorney general in the difficult situation of having to make that decision. and that very witness, john
overstate. you don t want to make the same mistake they made presuming president trump is guilty of collusion. i think attorney general barrr is very upset by what they did, even if it didn t treason, it s perjury, suborning perjury. submitting false documents to the fisa courts. colluding with the ukraine to obtain dirty information on the trump campaign. there are so many crimes, you don t need treason. i think three or four of them will be indicted. how do you walk away from an affidavit which you say it s verified and steele is reliable when you have to know that he isn t. i can t imagine they won t be able to prove the people who signed that didn t know this guy was a total flake. judge jeanine: you and i both
overstate. you don t want to make the same mistake they made presuming president trump is guilty of collusion. i think attorney general barrr is very upset by what they did, even if it didn t treason, it s perjury, suborning perjury. submitting false documents to the fisa courts. colluding with the ukraine to obtain dirty information on the trump campaign. there are so many crimes, you don t need treason. i think three or four of them will be indicted. how do you walk away from an affidavit which you say it s verified and steele is reliable when you have to know that he isn t. i can t imagine they won t be able to prove the people who signed that didn t know this guy was a total flake. judge jeanine: you and i both
you don t want to make the same mistake they made presuming president trump is guilty of collusion. i think attorney general barrr is very upset by what they did, even if it didn t treason, it s perjury, suborning perjury. submitting false documents to the fisa courts. colluding with the ukraine to obtain dirty information on the trump campaign. there are so many crimes, you don t need treason. i think three or four of them will be indicted. how do you walk away from an affidavit which you say it s verified and steele is reliable when you have to know that he isn t. i can t imagine they won t be able to prove the people who signed that didn t know this guy was a total flake. judge jeanine: you and i both
congress. how big a deal is that? if that s true, that s a big deal. obviously, you know, mr. sekulow is a lawyer himself, and he has certain ethical constraints that he would obviously have violated if he counseled someone else to lie. but on top of that, he would potentially be suborning perjury and that s very serious. do you feel like you understand the entirety of the facts before us? and i ask this because you just mentioned a whole bunch of things the caucus is unified about not letting them obscure, obstruct, deny things. just the public facts as they already exist in daylight, do you, congressman, feel like you have a synthesized version and you could sit down with a skpit yen constituent and give them a 60-second version? i might give them the cliff notes but there are a lot of unanswered questions. one very broad area of inquiry