tonight, the uk appears to be on the brink of taking military action with the us against houthi rebels who ve been attacking ships in the red sea. could parliament be recalled to discuss any uk military response? tonight we ll guide you step by step through this latest international crisis with our defence editor mark urban and our political editor nick watt. also tonight. breathtaking testimony from a fraud investigator employed by the post office to examine shortfalls at branches across the country his evidence helped wrongly convict multiple subpostmasters he investigated this ex branch manager who was suspended by the post office after shortfalls and fraud accusations. you have been told there was a growing body of cases and that in itself was not sufficient for you the question the reliability of the horizon system. because i am not technically minded. i would expect that to come from people above. shazia saddiq was with us last night and is back tonight. she was at th
on stock exchanges. the approval of the bitcoin exchange traded funds, or etfs, is seen by supporters as a watershed for crypto, giving it financial respectability and mainstream acceptance on wall street, after a string of controversies. erin delmore reports from new york. this decision was years in the making and now it will allow people and institutions to invest in bitcoin almost as easily as they buy stocks. the move could increase demand for bitcoin and legitimacy for the crypto currency industry, which has weathered scandal and scepticism. sec chair did not shy away from that in a statement saying, while we approve the listing and trading of certain ept spot bitcoin shares today, we did not approve or endorse bitcoin. he said investors should remain caution about the risks associated with bitcoin and said the crypto currency is, primarily a speculative volatile asset. while investors and crypto watchers awaited the decision, a false tweet was posted on the sec official
i had little input into that inquiry. i was there on the day of the interview but any pre or post work would have been by the person in charge of the inquiry. i5 person in charge of the inquiry. is a you had nothing to do with endorsing the content of the report? no. , ., endorsing the content of the report? no. , . , ., , no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when - no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when janet . that she was shocked when janet skinner was charged with theft. where you? this skinner was charged with theft. where you? skinner was charged with theft. where ou? a , where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. i - where you