the students. the same students who invited her. that s an important point. even if i am the only one that thinks that. there was such an uproar on campus, that this student group didn t jng i think we should mike make it known. the student paper, i will read a quick section. while free spreech is speech is important and there are problems with unacceptable, they must not be put in front of stereo types without emotional injury. itit is a place where others respect people s identities. i hope the president drafts all of these kids and puts them in a war to teach them a lesson. greg, you are saying your daughter or son is not.
horrible names and driving her out of school. but you can t say it s about fsu. i remember seeing women wearing ray rice shirts the day after ray rice punched his wife in the face on the elevator. unbelievable. you can afford to be a sportsman in a little watched sport. you have these football programs that pay for everything. that s why they are will be to protect these young men. football actually pays for itself. it s very big football schools that goes to revenue. i went to one michigan right. i was telling them you know football and basketball players essentially did have their own rules, but frankly, i never heard of anything like this i was editor of the student paper. we covered these guys pretty well. i didn t hear about the sort of violent incidents. we are beating up women.
letter. the articles released have been troubling to me. the responses to them more so. i cannot say what happened that night and i cannot prove the val validity, this story is not a hoax, a lie or a scheme. something terrible happened to jackie. and it s signed emily clark and published in the cavalier daily, the student paper. jackie is the nickname of this young woman. this emily clark, she witnessed jackie s intense depression and witnessed her withdrawal from social life. she doesn t know the specific facts even though she was one of the people who did learn something about being assaulted as jackie told her, she does not doubt her story and so while we don t know the details of that night, there were a lot of people who insist this young woman even if rolling stone didn t do her story justice, this woman was the victim of an
mr. zimmerman, just for appearing for your first appearances, our first appearance at this time for a charge of murder in the second degree and you are represented by mr. o mara, is that true. yes, sir. remember your right to remain silent and all the other rights he told you about, you have to say nothing, and we ll go forward here on some procedural matters only at this time. after reviewing the short affidavit for probable cause i find that probable cause for the charge as put in the information. the special prosecutor in this case charged zimmerman with second degree murder. that came down yesterday. no plea was entered during this particular court appearance, first appearance, and as the lawyer decided not to ask for bail at this time. le stay in custody, protective custody, awaiting a formal arraignment next month, may 29th. zimmerman came out of hiding yesterday, turned himself into police in sanford, and his attorney mark o mara says that zimmerman is afraid b
adjacent would understand that this is a misstep on his part. in fact, if you look at the statement as a whole, before that, what he is talking about is the specific weeds of the affordable care act, and the specific precedents that have led up to, you know, basic statement that this is constitutional. so, to listen to the right talk about this particularly the judges on the 5th circuit who gave a homework assignment to the d.o.j. to write about this, you would think that the president is calling for the overruling of the marbury legislation ruling, and this is p prepostrouse. we should look at it from the back of our hands. and a judge on the 5th circuit asked the department of j justice to write a student paper and like a three-page paper about marbury v. madison, a judicial review to show that the administration does support a separation of powers in which