me. i appreciate it, man. you are my friend, and you got my back, and i appreciate it, and i m very happy that it s another weekend. have a great weekend! you too. thank you to all of you at home for joining us tonight. happy friday. and it sure has been a busy one. it has been a bad day, if your name is donald trump. today, the january 6th committee issued a subpoena for the former president, and it is blistering, saying he, quote, personally orchestrated a multi part effort to overthrow the 2020 election. we will be getting to that, shortly. but, first, do you remember this photo? what you are looking at is a highly sensitive satellite photo showing an explosion at an iranian space center. this photo from an intelligence briefing was tweeted out to the world in august 2019, by none other than president trump. the fact that he gets so rattled intelligence officials and its soon led to internet sleuths being able to identify the u.s. spy satellite that took the photo. the
for why trump had all of this? you know, i think that is still a question of that, investigators are trying very hard to answer. i think one of the things that is sort of amazing about this entire process is there is a universe in which, if all of this stuff had been returned when asked, or even of all this stuff had been returned one demanded by a subpoena, we really would not be here. we really would not be necessarily at a criminal investigative state right now. so, i think it is hard to look inside some of it necessarily know exactly what they want, what they think but it s a major question, and it s a very important one for investigators to solve. presumably, they might be able to look into more than trump s heart, perhaps, there is some kind of communication that exist somewhere, that explains what exactly he was doing, squirreling away chinese and iranian intelligence at a speech club. do you think the sensitivity of these documents, combined with the of struck shun in plain
doesn t constituent ab struck shun of justice. no need to engage in an investigation. catherine herridge leading our coverage this hour. where are we on this as we begin another week? legal source familiar with the matter tells fox news the special counsel s office is still pulling together the team and defining the scope of the investigation and no final decision has been made on the firing of former f.b.i. director james comey and whether it s worthy of further investigation. on fox and friends this morning advisor kellyanne conway said the russia probe is short on results. we re starting to waste tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money on this endeavor. if there is something there let s hear about it. let the investigation go forward the president said. what are we talking about here really when the president is trying to move on with the policies and solutions of the day? democrats including the ranking member of the house intelligence committee said on sunday he stil
i don t understand why a retiree s complaint in 1977 e needs to be in a database. it is not just history, but it is who is currently working, and shows the cost of the value to ignore patterns of abuse. patterns that are being investigated by the d.o.j. protester are concerned that if the fop gets its way, the feds won t get a full picture of the police misconduct in chicago. and we have those pictures of jason van dyke walking into the courthouse with his attorney, and wearing a beanie, and very casual, but this time, wearing a suit. his attorney is no longer giving the press any interviews, but he has said in the past that he believed that his cliented in self-defense. now, about the deare struck shun of records, we should add that t