Against donald trump and get rid of this nightmare . Dude, ive been preaching it for the last six or eight months. I dont know why the party doesnt corral around one of these individuals on the stage to just say, this is the horse thats going to ride us to a brave new world. And they just cant. Because that base, small though it is, hes outsized in the money it produces, and the power it wields. And that, even in a parliamentary system, can overwhelm the system sometimes. Yeah, i was going to say, just look what happened to will hurd. As you said, booed there just for speaking truth to power. On a personal note, michael, i just want to say that its the first time ive seen you in person. Thank you so much for filling in for me a couple of weeks ago, i really appreciate it. The time off i owe you one, my friend. No pleasure, no pleasure. That just took a cold brew youve got it. Next time i see a pint consider it done. Good evening and welcome to ayman. The case against donald trump for t
really worth going to prison for donald trump. and i think he could look at the history of other people involved with donald trump, gotten involved with donald trump, and see that very often, even if donald trump the people around him are not. and it s just another lesson here, is don t work for donald trump. from that kind of most low level person to the vice president, there is nobody who comes out unscathed from their association with this person. andrew goldstein, renato, you may recall he s the lead investigator for the bob mueller obstruction investigation. he told in your signs, quote, demanding that islands be destroyed is the most basic form of obstruction and it is easy for a jury to understand. he also said that what s described in this indictment is actually more quote, straightforwardly criminal, then the obstructive act detailed in the mueller report. based on what you ve seen, do you agree?
gotten involved with donald trump, and see that very often, even if donald trump the people around him are not. and it s just another lesson here, don t work for donald trump. from that kind of most low level person to the vice president, there is nobody who comes out unscathed from their association with this person. andrew goldstein, we re not, all you might remember he is the lead investigator for the bob mueller obstruction investigation. he told the new york times quote, demanding that evidence be destroyed is the most basic form of obstruction and it is easy for a jury to understand. he also said that what s described in this indictment is actually more quote, straightforwardly criminal, then the obstructive acts detailed in the mueller report. based on what you ve seen, do you agree? how does evidence like this play in front of a jury? what would be your threshold to convince a jury that an
all you might remember he is the lead investigator for the bob mueller obstruction investigation. he told the new york times quote, demanding that evidence be destroyed is the most basic form of obstruction and it is easy for a jury to understand. he also said that what s described in this indictment is actually more quote, straightforwardly criminal, then the obstructive acts detailed in the mueller report. based on what you ve seen, do you agree? how does evidence like this play in front of a jury? what would be your threshold to convince a jury that an obstruction request, or destruction of evidence request, did in fact take place? is it simple to say hearsay is going to be enough to convince jurors? well, first of all, great question. i agree with that assessment. and the reason why i agree with that is the obstructive act that were discussed in the mueller report were for example, trying to fire mueller himself.