through? 50 reading of how west ham thought this throuuh? h reading of how west ham thought this throuuh? , ., , , through? so it s really interesting, i think, because through? so it s really interesting, i think, because outside through? so it s really interesting, i think, because outside england, | i think, because outside england, the story hasn t had as much cut through. i was talking to some people in south america, which is the patch i usually cover, and they were just full ofjokes and were just full of jokes and surprise. were just full ofjokes and surprise. but there is clearly. this expression we have now become quite used to here in england, which is cut through, i think the club perhaps didn t realise at first quite how controversial and how much cut through this is going to have among the fans. sol cut through this is going to have among the fans. so i think it is a really interesting development, not the incident itself, perhaps, which one could, you know, argue the
but let s say the basic outlines you never know what s going to happen in the trial. you never know what s going to do happen in hearings. nobody could have guessed what was going to happen in watergate. but watching these last two weeks, right, what we ve seen is that the basic story hasn t changed, it just gets more and more detailed, right? but the details are critical. i m actually with joe on this one, because think about friday. well, first of all, many of us, or at least i thought it will be useful to hear from the ambassador, but not that mind blowing, right? but donald trump s own behavior actually undermined the republican efforts of defense. if you remember the republicans press conference after they literally had to dodge the question about donald trump s tweets. they couldn t even respond in realtime to what those tweets meant because they were so abhorrent. and then we find out the thing we didn t know, when which was that there was going to be evidence of a phone
abca18 s were the other agent s notes and what was identified as the other agent s notes were not. we understand this has caused some confusion and we regret our error. why is this so significant? the crucial point of the case against mister flynn depends on what the agent says that he says, the interview, the warning about taking verbatim recording or anything like that. the entire case depends on what these two agents said and 18 months later they are looking at their file and realize we got the names of the two there is an explanation of that in our filings. whoever wrote that story hasn t read what is so important. we know agent abca18 conducted the interview as a pretext. we found a text message the government didn t produce but said that.
and weep have to call it for what it is. it s evil. meek this story hasn t been covered in depth because the government refuses to allow us to know, we do not know the number of children held in a large-scale orphanage in the united states of america. we have reports that each week in al pass owe exports at the airport, hundreds of children are lined up and put on palace dispart if a sults in america. the chrn are cordoned off it the to ask them their ladies and gentlemens, what country they re from, what state they re going to, what that s going to be their destination? but the bottom line gets to what
she has been listen to and she has been shown respect and she s been invited to come and tell her story. i m not totally convinced we re going to see her on thursday because her team keeps changing the demands. at first, they said that they wouldn t have senators involved and then somebody else was going to have to at those questions and now they re offended by that. they keep changing the rules around it. i think everybody deserves to be heard and to be respected, but you don t get to be believed automatically. harris: i want to give you the last word just in terms of what we could see later this week and what you re watching for. lawrence: i don t think she s going to show. people have been very critical of the people asking questions because quite frankly, the story hasn t checked out with the witnesses. people are saying they weren t there, people are saying they don t understand why they were mentioned and i m sorry, i used to be a democrat and i remember the stories of the de