with the monica thing she was a subpoenaed witness nine to nothing the supreme court the a denies there s any inappropriate relationship sko relati story hasn t blown they didn t deny the $130,000 payment. that s what left out me. the if nothing had happened, why did money change hands? if money didn t change hand why didn t they deny that money changed hands? so that s the first sort of red flag that leaps out. of course stormy daniels talked to others and confirmed she had
behind bars. we are criminalizing politics. but if you want to play hardball, and start knocking down donald trump s door and putting him under oath and saying this. 20 years ago you did this deal. i say, game on. investigate the swamp. you have every appropriations thing under the microscope, every donor, every fund-raiser, every lobbyist. make sure the whole swamp is put under oath because the whole thing reeks that has a funny way of boomer ringing on democrats. samantha power said she unmasked hundreds of people. many people were unmasked under her name. loretta lynch is in the cross hairs. this susan rice story hasn t been corroborated. when the dust settles, it s funny who is may be criminal. dana: you look at p.r. firms and lobbying firms in d.c. who were more than willing to take money from the russians. the kate steinle murder trial began today in san francisco. details straight ahead on
to impeachment or resignation. that s wildly premature and i think it would be unwise and premature of any democrats or anybody to be saying that right at this moment. but it doesn t go away. it is true that a lot of americans, the whole russia story hasn t been registering. but when you fire the fbi director who is overseeing the investigation, when these memos coming out suggesting you were trying to do something, if not impede the investigaon and don t forget that investigation was denied the funds that comey thought. when you have the information, the secret information being handed to russia, at some point, it gets critical velocity here. i think we re at the point, as i was saying earlier, you can t put this genie back in the bottle. it doesn t mean it leads to impeachment, but it does lead to an extensive and lengthy public investigation. we have the first sitting gop
and when you look forward, i mean, you re going to have the end of this month, another batch of e-mails are going to be released. and then you re going to have the but bernie is not surging because of the e-mails. i don t think that s what s going on. well, i think that s that is that s what the clinton campaign surrogates are saying. they can say that all they want. that s insane. you re not getting 15,000 and 20,000 people turning out for bernie s popularism because they ve got to watch a serverish smu. the crowd size is the least relevant issue. it s a combination of things. one, this nagging e-mail thing that s getting to an e-mail of trust that the clinton campaign needs to deal with. but more importantly, and this is the one parallel between bernie sanders and donald trump that i think is very relevant, they are both fearless.
annie, you eve been out on the road. do those analogies hold up? i think it s really hard to know. i mean, quite frankly, does everything everybody has said so far this year has been wrong. and one of the critical things is when you talk to people and i spent a lot of people talking to people in new hampshire, you say, what is going on with the clin tom campaign? there was a cbs poll earlier this week that suggested she s 22 points down in new hampshire. i ve been asking people why? how is this happening? new hampshire? a place that really for all of this discussion of bradley and previous campaigns, new hampshire is supposed to be a very, very friendly place for her. that was always supposed to be the way that it was. and the answer that i m getting is somewhat alarming for clinton s campaign, which is that and i know you discussed it before, but that this e-mail story hasn t gone away and she hasn t shut it down.