it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
people to be in charge of the government with elected representatives in charge of congress and the president. they want this permanent bureaucracy and a permanent bureaucracy of national archives and top breaches of fbi and the department of justice. donald trump refused to play along. that is why they been going after him six years. it s not just about donald trump either. it s about the democrats using law enforcement and the other tools of the administrative state to harass and persecute their opponents. jackie ibanez with the latest on the case, jackie. federal judge issuing a notice of preliminary intent over the event to appoint a third party attorney to review the documents seized from former president trump s mar-a-lago home. order of the justice department to provide and pursue a more detailed list of what was taken and that is due tomorrow. the hearing is scheduled for wednesday. this is a small victory from the trump team who has been pushing for the appointme
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redactredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dp documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you a contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. what classif
that be vigilant. it sucks. yeah. because. it turned out after the fact, the fact checkers looked into it no one of able to say it was false. trey: fbi said it routinely warns people about potential misinformation i wonder whyy this done warn themselves or fisa court. you had a high-minded discussion with your last get, most republicans including me, believes when it comes to trump, there is no law, it is all about getting him. there is a double standard when it comes to trump. what happened with hunter biden is that the fbi weighed in to make sure the story didn t break before the 2020 election, we have whistle-blowers at fbi telling senator grassley, they were told sho slowdown and back off hunter biden,