it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redactredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dp documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you a contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. what classif
there on the 4th of july as well. hello and welcome everyone, i m sandra smith. and look who is here. nice to see you. john has some time off, i m bill hemmer. this is america reports and good afternoon to you at home. we expect police to provide new details on the alleged plot very soon. richmond about two hours south of washington, d.c. sandra: we find our own mike emmanuel, live with us. we know in about an hour richmond police chief smith is going to brief reporters here in richmond on a plot, a tip they received related to a proposed mass shooting event in richmond on the 4th of july. we know arrests were made, weapons were seized, and beyond that law enforcement has been pretty tight lipped at this point. there was some violence over the holiday weekend in richmond, virginia as there was in many american cities, but it sounds like it could have been a whole lot worse. plans for a mass casualty attack around our national holiday and at this point it sounds li
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal