Their specific comments. They reviewed the findings that we have and we had a series of conversations about the specific legislation and discussing things that could be made from zoning and land use perspectives and then some of the things that would require further investment and discussion with other city agencies. Thank you,. Sure. The specific changes are, expanding the boundary in which impacting money can be spent to provide funding for projects in the adjacent neighborhoods. Broadening the membership relative to the first, that is the existing boundary of one mile . Currently, the funds, the infrastructure funds can be spent in the planning area or within 250 feet . Ok. Broadening the membership of the market activity cac, allowing a land dedication option for Affordable Housing requirements in the adjacent neighborhoods and new requirement to support Community Serving use thats the groundfloor. Expanding the unit mixed requirement and new general plan policy to apply a racial a
Be turned around within 72 hours but were seeing back ups especially with our provider labs and some of our own labs within the city. We are backing up seven days, ten days at this point. Thats something were seeing across the state and across the country. thank you director. Thank you madam mayor and dr. C olfax for your time. Any followup questions or questions after this meeting can be directed to dem press at sf dot org. Thank you for your time and that concludes todays press conference. Concludes todays press good afternoon welcome to the land use and Transportation Committee San Francisco board of supervisors for today monday july 20th. Im the chair of the Committee Supervisor aaron peskin joined by supervisor ahsha safai and dean preston and joined by colleague supervisor Hillary Ronen. Do you have any announcements . Due to the covid19 emergency to protect board members, City Employees and public, board of supervisors legislative chamber remain closed. Committee members will at
Past 80 years and in carrying for this art and as i indicated in an article that was in the journal california history earlier this year. So, i was especially saddened to read ucsfs proposal to destroy this art and on a birds view. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Are there any other members of the public who would like to comment on this item number four . Hello, my name is Richard Rothman and i am interested in murals in an fran and on occasion, ucsf is what we go into the hall and they told me they were going to build around them. If youve been in i called my contact at ucsf and they were going to build around them so i was wondering if one of the supervisors could ask mr. Newman why they changed their mind. The last time i talked in february and when i found out in june that they were going to destroy them. Why cant ucsf get around tobin hall and save the hall. Its very dangerous to move these murals. Its not something you want to do and maybe at the very, very last resort b
Months my family has been experimenting with cooking with my grandmothers recipe largely because a lot of the ingredients have been very easily accessible to us that means many different noodles and a lot of coconut and rice and not just we met in bangor who before that is encouraging his community to tell unique project dont do local and seasonal fruit. A typical traditional indian meat rice braid with a variety of side dishes each made up of a number of ingredients. But india has so too has the weights people eat means of become foster easier and much less diverse with many mediums even being flown in from around the world a study found that. Indians eat comes from abroad. As a campaigner for the revival of traditional food a mother of 2 she set up a garden the for the powers she grows through and vegetables. From limes and tomatoes and ginger much of its native to india. It fulfills almost all her needs. Its a cycle in the past when my kitchen goes to the tardis and. Come to get. Th
Against religious conduct released and stated in violation of the free exercise clause under Trinity Lutheran. The Montana Supreme Court disagrees and that court held boring schools did not violate the federal constitution. This board should reverse that judgment. Even respondents now concede that excluding Religious Schools from the program is unconstitutional they are viewed that the court avoided this discrimination by invalidating the entire program. This is wrong. The only reason the court invalidated the program was because it included Religious Schools and the courts remedy did not cure its discriminatory judgment nor should the remedy shielded judgment from review. Petitioners brought this lawsuit because they were denied scholarships based on religion and they are still being denied scholarships based on religion. If the court had shut down the program because it included muslim schools or africanamerican schools, theres no question that would be unconstitutional. We ask you t