This election has already been branded, like a building with his name on it. Unemployment, gdp, immigration, mueller, russia, china, north korea, the supreme court. They arent issues with differing views, so much as as a source of dialogue from the very foundation to the roof, about the influence of one person, dch trump. Other democrats have spoken of their credentials and vision for the future. But its fanciful to suggest that because voters dont bring up trump on the campaign trail, its sufficient for candidates to only speak of their vision for america. Yes, Democratic Candidates need to have a compelling vision for america, but to win, they must also win the tugofwar for the president for the swing voters and to motivate others who dont vote to get off the sideline. Races with incumbents are usually a referendum on the incumbent. This time, especially so. And each democratic candidate must initially convince the primary electorate, why theyre best suited to beat the president. Joe
How Do You Cure a Compassion Crisis? (Ep 444 Rebroadcast) - Freakonomics freakonomics.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from freakonomics.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
How Do You Cure a Compassion Crisis? (Ep. 444)
December 16, 2020 @ 11:00pm Listen now:
Patients in the U.S. healthcare system often feel they’re treated with a lack of empathy. Doctors and nurses have tragically high levels of burnout. Could fixing the first problem solve the second? And does the rest of society need more compassion too?
Listen and subscribe to our podcast at
Today’s episode is really interesting. There are two ways we could start it, but I can’t decide which is better. One way is nasty and vulgar, like this:
Tiffany INGHAM: Well, why are you looking then, retard?