case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
the matter of the judge beingknw assigned to this case. you know, i the banner says m trump impeachment lawyer. for me, that was an honor,e thonor a great honor. utfor me. right bus t i ve been a civil rightseh and a criminal lawyer my whole career. i represente d the democratic lawyer l party last year. i represented a socialist candidate foasr president . i enty , twenty . i am concernedam about the integrity of the system. i m concerned about process.obe judge s a realm problem here that this judge was assigned to each of these cases.practiceo this is an historic practice in this office that wasff commentea on by a report 2002 by a new york city bar.ity complained top criminal lawyers in the city complained about this judgis judgetice.e shopping pra the case. they lost a case challenging it, buchallet a federal judge sn the frank and frank and leo case, in two thousand four that the impartiality and the appearance of impartialityof of the system is directly at stake and is at risk b