rights protections for their stay constitution, voting it down 59 to 41%. now just to put that in a little bit more into context, to put the entire political earthquake into context, that ballot question was supposed to be an easy win for the antiabortion side. was not even supposed to be close. a recent poll said the 47% of kansans plan to vote yes on the amendment compared to no gland vote no. and republicans were supposed to cruise to victory with their demographic advantage. last night, most of the primary races were for republicans. there was not much incentive for democrats to even show up, aside for this one ballot question. and it was a strategic and very cynical question to put this question on the primary ballot, instead of the general election. proponents of the measure were hoping and planning for a low turnout. the question itself was intentionally garbled to confuse people. the text read in part quote, to the extent permitted by the constitution of the united s
several calls with several republican senators. if president trump was not calling law enforcement or military leaders, whether president trump spent his time doing that afternoon? while he for settled into the dining room? he was calling senators to encourage them to delay or object to the certification. here is kayleigh mcenany, his press secretary to explain. all, right back there and he wants the list of senators. that he is calling bill would buy, one to know youth color? to buy recollection, though. there is a searing made a strong case that trump did not fail to act to set the bounds, he refused to this by police from the top aides and family members. if he was not a failure to act or ineptitude it was a strategy. he was not feeling to stop interaction about waiting to see if it worked. as the camera field, when the attack failed to stop the certification of the election, there was one person to home trump directed his eye at. on the screen is the last photog
rights protections for their stay constitution, voting it down 59 to 41%. now just to put that in a little bit more into context, to put the entire political earthquake into context, that ballot question was supposed to be an easy win for the antiabortion side. was not even supposed to be close. a recent poll said the 47% of kansans plan to vote yes on the amendment compared to no gland vote no. and republicans were supposed to cruise to victory with their demographic advantage. last night, most of the primary races were for republicans. there was not much incentive for democrats to even show up, aside for this one ballot question. and it was a strategic and very cynical question to put this question on the primary ballot, instead of the general election. proponents of the measure were hoping and planning for a low turnout. the question itself was intentionally garbled to confuse people. the text read in part quote,
and this year s election, a record number of abortion related measures will be on the ballot in at least five states. several of those are proposals to amend state constitution to address abortion rights directly. on august, second that is ten days from now, voters in the state of kansas will consider animate. opposed by republicans, seeks the carroll fly that stay constitution does not protect abortion rights. this will be the force abortion related measure that americans will vote on a post-roe era, the most recent polling indicates it will be a close one. even in kansas. when we come, back i will talk about the president and the future of a post roe america. i ll be joined by a sapphire chrysalis, a doula, and activists and elizabeth nash. her track state abortion laws for the institute and do not go away. they re not going to miss this. not g away away they r