unacceptable. do you ever think there are too many rules? yes. i think that all the time. we don t invent the building codes, we re the enforcers. how is any normal human supposed to understand it and follow it? i don t have that answer. they i don t have that answer. if you look behind me, we have 24 statute books. i m a lawyer, i m supposed to know all the statutes. builders can t possibly know all this but they are taught how to look this stuff up. why don t you just do what they ask? if we do what they want we destroy the reason we re there. we want primitive natural living and they want us to have modern buildings. i m not going to do what they want me to do. what will happen to him? we ll get back to that. first, what will happen if i try to be a cab driver?
completely ptable. do you ever think there are too many rules? yeah. i think that all the time. but we don t write the building code, we re merely the enforcer. how is any normal human supposed to understand this and follow it. i don t have an answer. they i don t have that answer. if you look behind me, we have 24 statute books. i am aware i am supposed to know all those statutes. builders obviously can t possibly know all this, but they are taught how to look this stuff up. why don t you do what they ask? if we do what we want, we destroy the reason we re there. we want to teach about primitive, natural living. they want us to have modern buildings. i m not going to do what they want me to do. so what will happen to him? we ll get back to that. but first, what will happen if i try to be a cab driver?
it entrenched who we were, who our friends could be and what our lives could become. this is not separate but equal. it is separate and discriminated. separate and oppressed. separate and browbeated and separate and subjugated. so let us be rid of it. as long as there is one rule for us and another for them, we allow the barriers of acceptance to go unchallenged. as long as our statute books suggest that love between two men and two women are not worthy of marriage we allow homophobia to fester. oscar wilde was released from prison at the age of 42. he moved to prison where he lived in poverty and died at the age of 46. in prison he wrote, society, as we have constituted it, will have no place for me, has none to offer but nature, whose sweet
if they were married and only when they were over 30. it is the same naivety that gave way for my dad, being a citizen when he arrived here in 1956, but refused by landlords and proclaimed no blacks, no irish, it entrenched who we were, who our friends could be and what our lives could become. this is not separate but equal. it is separate and discriminated. separate and oppressed. separate and browbeated and separate and subjugated. so let us be rid of it. as long as there is one rule for us and another for them, we allow the barriers of acceptance to go unchallenged. as long as our statute books suggest that love between two men and two women are not worthy of marriage we allow homophobia to fester. oscar wilde was released from prison at the age of 42.
what one congress passes, the other can override. for example, one of the so-called triggers that this deal says will take effect if the spending cuts are not made is the payments to medicare providers, to doctors would be cut. well, that s been on the statute books for six years and for six years, the 6% annual cuts have been canceled by congress and has a 36% cut looming on the table. what they they can just repeal those triggers. i think that the key is that on september 30th when this fiscal year expires, congress should not pass a budget but instead the house should pass continuing resolutions to keep the government open until january 1st and then use that to hold obama s feet to the fire to make sure that the cuts really take place. we have one more piece of leverage and we have to use it that way. what you re saying is we need kind of belt and suspenders here, dick, what s being passed