going to be called on, the court process is going to be used, among other things, to determine whether or not the supposedly defamatory allegation was true. so the court will effectively be used in this case if it goes forward to prove whether or not trump sexually and aggressively groped that woman. so that case at least for now will go forward. although the president s side certainly will appeal. as a secondary consequence of that landmark ruling today about state lawsuits being okay against a sitting president, we also got this late in the day. the new york state attorney general going forward with a case against president trump s foundation, his so-called charity. now, that may sound surprising to you because you might remember that in december the president s charity was shut down after the new york attorney general filed a lawsuit that alleged persistently illegal conduct at that foundation. well, apparently it being shut down doesn t mean it s out of trouble legally. within hour
as a secondary consequence of that landmark ruling today about state lawsuits being okay against a sitting president, we also got this late in the day. the new york state attorney general going forward with a case against president trump s foundation, his so-called charity. that may sound pricing to you because you may remember in december the president s charity was shut down after the new york attorney general filed a lawsuit that alleged persistently illegal contact at the foundation. well apparently it being shut down doesn t mean it s out of trouble legally. within hours of that summer zervos appeals court ruling today. attorney gener attorney general tich james in new york. was back in court saying shutting down the presidential foundation down is not enough. and new york state is going after him for it. quoting from the filings today. quote mr. trump used the foundation s assets for his own benefits and the benefit of entities in which he had a financial interested interest
to prove one way or another whether nasty sounding allegations are actually true. somebody says you defamed them, they bring you to court for it, right? ultimately the court will be called on, the court process will be used among other things to determine whether or not the supposedly defamatory allegation was true. the court will effectively be used in the case if it goes forward to prove whether or not trump sexually and aggressively groped that woman. so that case at least for now will go forward, although the president e s certainly will appeal. as a secondary consequence of that landmark ruling today about state lawsuits being okay against a sitting president, we also got this late in the day, the new york state attorney general going forward with a case against president trump s foundation, his so-called charity. that may sound surprising to you because you might remember in december the president s charity was shut down after the new york
bill that cuts early voting from about 47 days down to 14 days prior to an election. wisconsin republicans have said they re at a disadvantage because some major democratic cities offer early voting for a longer period of time compared to rural regions. the bill gives state lawmakers the power of deciding whether to withdraw from state lawsuits. this would prevent the incoming democratic attorney general to withdrawing to repeal the affordable care act. and banning guns at the state capitol and required to get permission before changes in certain programs. governor walker has to sign these bills into law. a wisconsin democrat lawmaker says this session was an embarrassment as republicans say the new measures level the playing field. why are we here today? what are we doing? we shouldn t be here for an extraordinary session just weeks after a campaign. doesn t guarantee we ll win.
problem, but the community doesn t back it up. the white community and all communities in america have been affected, and in certain cases disproportionately with regard to large metropolitan areas. we are actually not directly involved in the federal lawsuit, we are representing a number of cities and counties who are bringing state lawsuits to try to hold big pharma accountable. what our lawsuits allege is that this was not an epidemic in the sense that it just happened to america, this was an intentional conduct starting from the mid- 90s where a big farmer decided to lie to the american people, convinced them they were selling a new brand of opioid that was not addictive and it was exactly the same type. it got america hooked on painkillers and has cost communities literally hundreds of billions of dollars. but you would also concede