county prosecutor s office is going to be involved in this along with oakland county where the shooting had actually happened. what would the wayne county prosecutor s office be charging in this? i think it s premature to know whether they re part of the ongoing investigation or whether the charges actually happen there. there will need to be very specific charges tied to the locations where crime occurred. we re talking here about state court and state jurisdiction, which is by county. so, for instance, you can t charge something that happens in oakland county in wayne county. the prosecutors will have to sort out those details and bring charges in the proper venues. and and now that they are in custody, the police chief was talking about other people possibly being involved, other investigations ongoing like who had this building that they were found in. what would be the process for that now? how could you charge somebody in
and allow the law to stand regardless of what the courts did. and the gimmick or trick or whatever you want to call it, donna edwards, is vigilanteism, is turning citizens into bounty hunters. the new york times has another story explaining how it works. quote, there s little precedent for the provision that deputizes ordinary citizens to enforce an effective ban on abortions and offers them a financial incentive to do so, giving private citizens the right to file suit in lieu of or in tandem with criminal enforcement by state oy fishes is a staple of medical malpractice cases and other forms of tort law. the texas law is different. it removes enforcement entirely from state jurisdiction and vastly expands who can sue and be sued over abortions. it obviously introduces a whole new layer of sort of cultural strive potentially. what do you make about its prospects for success in front
manhattan district attorney investigation. tax cases tend to be federal cases. i imagine there is state jurisdiction here. if you are filching on taxes for the federal government, you problemry are with the state as well. you tend to use the same numbers to file them both. how does it play to think about an investigation like this? well, tax cases are lost when they get in the fine details and complexity instead of the fundamental issue of fraud. when we see an indictment, assuming we do, it may be focused on other things. new york has a state level racketeering law, and they might well bring the charge in that direction. but they re going to avoid a case where the prosecutors get up and say under section da, da,
prosecutor. they have forensic efforts, experts has of just recently they have assistance from experienced attorneys, from the new york attorney generals office. so they have been really looking into this. and by only counts, they ve seen witnesses, collected additional documents and many prosecutors and people from the office have suggested that up until this meeting, it was only a matter of time until the manhattan da convened a grand jury. because at some point, they need to start hearing from witnesses about the story that these documents tell. david, how should i think about tax law in relation to a manhattan district attorney investigation? my sense is that past cases or federal cases, i imagine there s some state jurisdiction here, right? because if you re filtering on taxes from the federal government, you probably are for the state as well.
Die katholische Kirche muss sich selbst in Frage stellen heise.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heise.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.