you for that. katy constitutional law att attorney. you know, katy, what does this decision mean? does it circle what the courts in dobbs decision which effectively left this in the states hands-free night have a drug that s used to cross state boundaries all over the country. an out pointed out more than five men people abuse over the past 23 years or so. so, does that circle with the decision itself that they made? that s an interesting question i think we do have to remember that when the court looked at dobbs they were questioning whether abortion was a federal right essentially. the question in the current case is much more narrow and deals with a federal agency properly complied with the federal law in approving the drug in rolling back some of the restrictions on access to it. so i think here the supreme court actually made a decision that seems pretty consistent with the prior precedent which
for the nation and the world people literally literally com from all over the world in order to get the highest and medical care available anywher here in the state, here in the bay state. and i wonder, given that, give that reputation for excellence and the predominance of, not the predominance, but th prevalence of such excellent care and such good medical providers in this state, i wonder if you have specifi fears about where a state like yours is most vulnerable, in terms of republican states, an republican political actors, and conservative judges, tryin to effectuate a de facto national ban on thes procedures obviously, there s the questio of whether they will jus pursue that through federa legislation. but there s these other ways that they can approach it to try to cross state boundaries, get into states that have even when you want it to be a saf right, and try to take it away for backdoor means where do you think the biggest
as you mentioned massachusetts is a medical hub for the nation and the world people literally come from all over the world in order to get the highest medical care available here in the state, here in the bay state. and i wonder given that, given the reputation for excellence and the predominance not predominance but the prevalence of such excellent care and such good medical providers in this state. i wonder if you have specific fears about sort of where a state like yours is most vulnerable in terms of republican states and republican political actors and conservative judges trying to effectuate a de facto national ban on these procedures. obviously there s the question of whether they ll just pursue that through federal legislation, but there s these other ways they can try to approach it to cross state boundaries, get into states even where you want it to be a safe
newsome. california some of the strongest gun laws in the country. what more in your opinion can be, should be done? well, the problem is, you know, guns don t pay much attention to state boundaries. california can have strong laws. connecticut can have strong laws. but weapons cross state lines. and so these assault-style weapons that are used in mass shootings, you can t buy them in california and connecticut but you can buy them in texas and georgia and transport them into our states. same thing with the crime guns used in hartford and los angeles. the illegal gun trade, those guns move from states with very loose background checks where criminals and gun traffickers can easily buy guns in states with more rigorous background checks. until we have a federal law banning mass murder assault weapons and requiring everybody to go through a background check
lawmaki m sick and tired of the, i m sick of it. i don t ever see this again. i don t ever want to see you again, in this condition, i m serious! i m not making this up about all of these notes. how many of these governors have we seen this doing the same dance that we ve seen today? china s house chris murphy, connecticut who has been with governor newsom, tonight, in the wake of the mass murder at sandy hook elementary school, ten years ago. senator hug, thank you joining. as you what governor newsom, there, as you know i have the strongest gun laws in the country. what more, in your opinion, can be, should be, done? well the problems, guns don t pay much attention to state boundaries, california can have strong line laws. can i could have strong laws. but the weapons across state