Legal across state boundaries, especially through telemedicine, which is also legal for all circumstances right now because of the state of the public health emergency. but the ability to even just describe medications or drifr medications across state lines is being called into question as well as providers within states. if i am a patient inside a state where i want access to a medical abortion, there is potential laws on the books at the state level this is going to play out at the state level. the federal administration has weighed in that this is legal, this is safe. they can do everything they can to scare not just the providers, but to scare people from seeking out this information. so, all the targeted ads that we would normally hope could reach people in places they are, online shopping, those things. you re seeing those things being taken down because people are afraid anyone putting up those ads will be targeted. there are many of us who are trying to figure out how to hel
Anyone with eyesight and common sense, but what do we do about the host in increasingly large number of people climate deniers? we re on the verge of having water wars in the western part of this country. what do we do about the climate deniers? well, this has been a problem for 30 years, but as i say, i believe now the effects of climate change are so obvious that people will come around. and when it comes to water out west, these are generally very conservative politicians managing a natural resource. and understand, in the united states, the west depends on water. it always has. and people have discussed the problems associated withdrawing state boundaries on north and south lines rather than on watersheds. that aside, we now have to manage this water. and a problem will come when it does rain again out west here,
New york or chicago, you know, my payoff in bigger ways than some of the other provisions of this bill around red flags or background checks on under 21 year olds. that s why want to man-to-man. the supply issues seem so pressing here. there are so many guns in the country, there been so many assault just in the last three years. this seems you have individual actors, right? someone who has some type of distress that might be stopped by a background check. and what we also know is that without the federal government being involved in going after gun trafficking, states really helpless. because the trafficking occurs across state boundaries. but the gun lobby had been incredibly effective for 30 years in stopping the passage of a federal prohibition on trafficking. because they knew that ultimately that was gonna make it a lot harder for this illegal flow of guns that makes
and i think what s really important is i think it s really important to reach out to people who were in the middle on this issue. people who believe in their right to bear arms but also understand, as the majority of americans do, that it s okay to have restrictions on that right. that s we have to really reach out more to those people. i just mentioned what buffalo s doing, what los angeles is doing. you led the fight in colorado on loopholes. we saw florida after parkland and connecticut after sandy hook. not much movement at the federal level. should the focus be on state and local, where there has been some movement instead of congress? what do you think? i think it s important that stakes take action and a number of states have taken action like we have in colorado. but at some point, guns cross state boundaries just as easily as an automobile does. so, colorado is surrounded by a number of states that have very weak gun laws so that s a danger to colorado. that s why in