Were the Democrats to defend control of the House and the Senate, there would be continuity in the administration s policy on Asia. Of course, there is internal debate even within the Democratic Party about its policy on Asia, but most lawmakers are reluctant to openly criticise their President s foreign policy, writes Joshua Kurlantzick, senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations in Japan Times.If t
Were the Democrats to defend control of the House and the Senate, there would be continuity in the administration s policy on Asia. Of course, there is internal debate even within the Democratic Party about its policy on Asia, but most lawmakers are reluctant to openly criticise their President s foreign policy, writes Joshua Kurlantzick, senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations in Japan Times.If t
Analysts believe that the results of the November 8 US midterm elections could have "significant implications" for the Asia-Pacific region.Were the Democrats to defend control of the House and the Senate, there would be continuity in .
As the world faces a democratic recession, many of the most common explanations fall short. But looking more closely at antidemocratic leaders’ motivations and methods reveals valuable insights about different types of backsliding and how international actors should respond.