political conquences for what i was doing. i am an inspector general. it was one of the staff directors for one of the committees on the hill that we work with a lot. i don t want to name his name. he is no longer there. tucker: political considerations could have no bearing on this? absolutely not. you are not a d or an r. you are an ig. those are the letters that matter for you. this guy is just a pawn of the right. a shill of the right and attack the messenger. tucker: you heard complaints from the intelligence agencies, their information was on an unsecured server. you bring concerns to the congress and you are dismissed as a right wingplant? absolutely. that s a good point. the agencies were unhappy about what was going on. they were not happy their
general, that is my job, it s not to consider their political consequences. it was one of the staff directors for one of the committees on the hill that we have worked with a lot. i don t want to name his name right now. he s no longer there, as a matter of fact. tucker: political considerations, by definition, should have no bearing. absolutely not. as a i.g., you are not a d, you are letter are, you are a i.g. what they resorted to, he s a pawn of the right, a shill of the right, attack the messenger, that is what happens. tucker: to sum this up, to make this clear, you in effect, you heard complaints from intelligence agencies at their information was residing on an unsecured server. you bring this concerns to the congress and you are dismissed as a right-wing pond prayed absolutely. that s a good point. the agencies were quite unhappy about what was going on. they were not happy that their information was not protected the way it should have been.
have only been shared with the gang of eight an staff directors on the house and senate side. it s safe to say that our staff currently is working through thousands of raw intelligence and products to, one, determine whether the process that the reviewers went through to compile their report we re in agreement with and to see if our competence levels on their ratings of low, medium or high confidence, in fact, match. to date, as i said, they ve been provided thousands of page of documents and have reviewed, to date, a majority of those documents. we are within weeks of completing the review of those documents. i might say that we re in constant negotiations with the intelligence community about access to additional documents,
documents that up to this point have only been shared with the gang of eight and staff directors on the house and senate side. it s safe to say that our staff currently is working through thousands of raw intelligence and analytic products to, one, determine whether the process that the reviewers went through to compile their report were in agreement with and to see if our confidence levels on their ratings of low, medium, or high confidence, in fact, match. to date, as i said, they ve been provided thousands of pages of documents and have reviewed, to date, a majority of those documents. we re within weeks of completing the review of those documents. i might say that we re in constant negotiations with the
documents that up to this point have only been shared with the gang of eight and staff directors on the house and senate side. it s safe to say that our staff currently is working through thousands of raw intelligence and analytic products to, one, determine whether the process that the reviewers went through to compile their report were in agreement with, and to see if our confidence levels on their ratings of low, medium or high confidence, in fact, match. to date, as i said, they ve been provided thousands of pages of documents and have reviewed to date a majority of those documents. we re within weeks of completing the review of those documents. i might say that we re in constant negotiations with the intelligence community about