week with james comey. undoubtedly this issue came up and raised concerns about comments made last night where he said on fox news that the cia was hacked. and was that classified information. the president of course can declassify anything he wants. did president trump mean to do it and do it in a thoughtful way that you do when you declassify classified information. that s something else that they are shining a spotlight on. that moved things forward schiff is saying that comey will say there was no evidence. that s a huge huge deal. manu thank you for grabbing the chairman for us. and mark, just for some analysis
world s leaders to the city at the same time. we can say safely we have never seen anything like this. we look forward to it. reporter: this latest arrest illustrates how isis social media is reaching young people, even inspiring them to attack the pope while he is in the u.s. now, like the vatican, new york authorities saying there is no credible threat against the pope. some reports this morning saying that the plot by this young man alleged as it is was really aspirational. meanwhile, the vatican saying that it fully expects the president to meet the pope s plane as he lands in d.c. pope francis arriving in the u.s. for the first time. ari? keir simmons, thank you. straight ahead, more 2016 politics. spotlight on hillary clinton. latest polling showing that the e-mail problems persisting. we have everything you need to know about the controversy answered in, yes, six questions or less. we ll be back in three. [ male announcer ] whether it takes 200,000 parts,
speaking to us from new york. thank you. thanks. teresa sullivan, president of the university of virginia is reacting to this review. she said in part, rolling stone s story did nothing to combat sexual violence, and it damaged serious efforts address the issue. she goes on to say, irresponsible journalism unjustly damaged the reputations of many innocent individuals and the university of virginia. this entire thing has been a complete mess for everybody involved. the worst part is the issue they were trying to put a spotlight on, the topic they wanted to bring attention to, they almost made more difficult. victims, young women on college campuses, who already feel reluctant to speak out and talk about campus rape may be more reluctant now. and the story, the journalism, just unbelievable. we re journalists, it s to see this sort of thing has been
down and said equal protection, you know, it should be struck down. right, right, right. just today, the supreme court, as you said, 6 to 2. because because earlierstate p, we do not want preferential treatment based on race or gender or what have you, we will allow the state voters to decide. now that is the law in michigan as it is in about seven other states. and you know why? it s a state by state call. correct. the program government is not imposing anything. there is no authority in the u.s. constitution to undermine elections. this is alection where they put this proposal forward. gay marriage election in california. so there is some inconsistencies here. oh. legal reasoning. absolutely. technicality though. spotlight on. it s always the same argument. you are doing the human rights thing. you know, that you pass a law that restricts affirmative action, that s gonna unfairly target african-americans or hispanic americans. and you are going to pass a l
down and said equal protection, you know, it should be struck down. right, right, right. just today, the supreme court, as you said, 6 to 2. kagan recused herself because she had been involved earlier said no, if the state passes this thing, we do not want preferential treatment based on race or gender or what have you, we will allow the state voters to decide. now that is the law in michigan as it is in about seven other states. and you know why? it s a state by state call. correct. the program government is not imposing anything. there is no authority in the u.s. constitution to undermine elections. this is a state election where they put this proposal forward. gay marriage election in california. so there is some inconsistencies here. oh. legal reasoning. absolutely. technicality though. spotlight on. it s always the same argument. you are doing the human rights thing. you know, that you pass a law that restricts affirmative action, that s gonna unfairly