[second man] ah,ah, ah. oh no! [first man] saves us some drilling. [burke] and we covered it, february fourteenth, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we ve seen a thing or two. we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum president trump s accusation that the former president, braumd tapped his phones during the campaign, taking the spotlight off of russia. robert ray and john flannery. robert, to you, now. the attorney general had to recuse himself many his confirmation hearing starts tomorrow, why not put the investigation in the hands of an independent prosecutor? because it sends a terrible message, particularly early on in an administration. my concern is with the institution, the department of justice. if you lift the investigation
he has to win that and putting all his eggs in that basket and natalie. back to trump and what he didn t say last night at that town hall, any indication that maybe he did that on purpose to steal a little bit of the spotlight off of carly fiorina knowing that we are talking about her and that she is really standing out? reporter: well, look, this is a question from the audience and i will not get into conspiracy theories here, and this is a dynamic, when trump gets in hot water with one controversy, it s amazing how quickly he can do something outrageous or say something outrageous and steal the spotlight back to him and sometimes it happens multiple times a day, and candidates are still trying to figure out how to overcome that in a way that let s them get their own message
defense, they re basically arguing the sentencing phase. even though guilt or innocence on the murders will be decided first. yeah, it will be decided first. but what they ve essentially done is they ve basically taken the spotlight off of whether or not he did it they just said, look, he did it. they re still going to go through the state of the trial because the state has to prove it because we live in a country where it s the state s burden. they may stipulate to certain things so that the testimony doesn t get too graphic. but what they re going to focus the jury on and what they re going to focus everything on is the pressure on tsarnaev, on his love for his brother, on the fact that he was highly influenced by the brother. they re also going to point out every chance they can where the brother was the mastermind. they ll bring in panels of the boat where tsarnaev wrote certain things on the boat but they ll also bring in the side of the boat that was riddled with gunfire. and t
something you buy, but obviously it is for free. that got retweeted over and over and over again. why couldn t he have just said well i was just watching and said what i saw. but it wasn t like he said he was sorry for what he said. he was sorry because he took the spotlight off of his teammate. which is different. that s a a different type of apology. i just want/c+jñ to point out that i tweeted lol, that was the greatest post game interview ever. erin andrews, whatever her maim is, she will never do better work. she didn t say anything. right, and that was her best work ever, the best thing in her life. do you think his apology is sincere? i don t like apologies. stop apologizing. you are on the football field and you say stuff. worse things was said on that field at that game. people are bashing their heads. it is like stop interviewing people on the field.
lead evaporating in florida and gone nationwide. it shows a virtual romney-gingrich dead heat, a sharp change this last week before the south carolina blowout victory. those numbers could and certainly will change. for now, the trend is so worrying to romney forces, they re doing what they rarely do, taking the challenger, not through super pacs but directly. while florida families lost everything in the housing crisis, newt gingrich cashed in. gingrich was paid over $1.6 million by the scandal ridden agency that helped create the crisis. that new ad was straight from the romney campaign, this earlier today was straight from the stump. i m calling on speaker gingrich to do two things, release all the work product associated with his work at freddie mac and return the funds he made from freddie mac. i wouldn t have normally suggested that other than he was the one that said if you made money on this failed model you ought to return that money. within hours of that, the