found in the report, and he was questioning horowitz on this issue. watch. i think we have the sound.h if we don t have the sound bite. he said you honestly believe the american people are going to look at this report and believeh look at those emails that there was no bias. horowitz essentially said that s why we found out that it impacts the credibility of the handling of of the investigation. we laid out all the facts are. it was interesting when he said that, chris, because he seemed to say welcome we laid out the facts and we said it affects the credibility. but they couldn t conclude that it affected the ultimate outcome of decided to charge mrs. clinton or not. kind of splitting hairs there. seem to indicate the bias was a factor in the credibility of the investigation. if any was biased in 2016 by the fbi s action, it was hillary clinton and her
he gets a juicy contract with cnn. this is bogus. brian: couple of things, what you just said dr. sebastian goo gorka coming up. we are going to leave the room you brief him one-on-one. number two it s important he said to jake at that pointner january this the deal. the question is did it happen after the inauguration few days in january he was president-elect and not president. that s splitting hairs. and clapper has a record of not telling the truth. he has already been caught lying and he obviously is not a good liar. only time he perks up when he seems to be caught in a lie. besides that every time he talks it s like we woke him up in the middle of the night. real quick, john brennan s tweets. his tweets are inflammatory. maybe vladimir putin has something on this president. this guy is a cia director. he is not some pundit from a third rate cable show. this is shocking. never in american history has a former civil servant of his ranking done what he
were. the idea that he was going to go in and just straight-up lie, i mean, that s something that i think everybody is going to want to see in writing and see exactly what was said. and that s what i think people are going to be able to make their decision on. well, is this somebody that should be fired? is this splitting hairs? or what is this? obviously, look this doesn t timing-wise, this doesn t look great for the justice department because of all of the taunting that the president has done on andy mccabe. it s going to contribute to the perception, if he gets fired that jeff sessions is doing the president s bidding. there is that to consider. we re much obliged to our panel tonight, from the new york times, matt apuzo, from the post graduate preek bharara school of law, jennifer rogers and mimi roke character formerly of the southern district of new york. coming up, the white house goes against the russians but not the president per se. the brits have been attacked which
to see in writing and see exactly what was said. and that s what i think people are going to be able to make their decision on. well, is this somebody that should be fired? is this splitting hairs? or what is this? obviously, look this doesn t timing-wise, this doesn t look great for the justice department because of all of the taunting that the president has done on andy mccabe. it s going to contribute to the perception, if he gets fired that jeff sessions is doing the president s bidding. there is that to consider. we re much obliged to our panel tonight, from the new york times, matt apuzo, from the post graduate preek bharara school of law, jennifer rogers and mimi roke character formerly of the southern district of new york. coming up, the white house goes against the russians but not the president per se. the brits have been attacked which should mean we ve all been attacked. a reality check when we come back.
and that can be really the kiss of death for an fbi agent. there s really no coming back from that. the issue here is as we understand it, mccabe and his people, you know, strenuously deny that he misled anybody. and so i think it s absolutely crucial that, you know, we see we see the report, we see what was actually said, what were the words that were used in the interviews where mccabe talked to the inspector general. andy mccabe is no dummy here. and he knew what the stakes were. the idea that he was going to go in and just straight-up lie, i mean, that s something that i think everybody is going to want to see in writing and see exactly what was said. and that s what i think people are going to be able to make their decision on. well, is this somebody that should be fired? is this splitting hairs? or what is this? obviously, look this doesn t timing-wise, this doesn t look