giuliani split hairs between cash, check. he didn t add money order, but you can throw that in there. why is that irrelevant? stephanie, the reason why it s irrelevant, because it goes to the bigger issue. it doesn t really matter whether it was cash or financing. by the way, when michael cohen speaks of financing, i don t think he s speaking of financing as it relates to, you know, are they going to go get a loan or something. i think what he s speaking to is how are they going to make the payment. the bigger issue in my mind is that this does not appear to be the first time that these two guys have sat down and engaged in conversations about how payments like this were going to be made. more importantly than that, and this goes back to my first point, michael cohen could easily fill in the gaps on what we re talking about. he could provide the context. he could provide a two-paragraph or three-paragraph written statement. he doesn t even have to go on
the warren report? because of the conspiracy theories, who have put this case under a high-powered microscope, splitting hairs and then proceeding to split the split hairs. the kennedy case is now the most complex murder case by far in world history. nothing even remotely comes close. we are left with the series of real and critical questions about the assassination. questions which have not been answered to the satisfaction of the people of the united states. when president kennedy was killed, he was not killed by one man. he was shot from a number of different directions by different guns. the story has been suppressed. witnesses have been killed. and this is your country. we aren t trying to hide a thing from you or from mr. epstein or mr. lane or the world. we are laying it all out. that s right here in the notes of testimony. and if we have transposed in error a possibly into a probably, then we are delighted to have you point it out to us. but you can do so only because
you are accusing them of malfeasance. you are part of the media which prevented the american people from finding out what happened. you are alarming the american people! i say the american public should be alarmed. the public had been kept in the dark for so long about this, but had an undying thirst, which could only be quenched by getting facts. we have a right to know who killed our president and why he died. and we can t get that from reading the warren report. at the start, lane was almost alone. now he s just one among a growing band of doubters. their books and articles are on the newsstands, they re in the supermarkets. now according to a recent poll, only one in three americans remains convinced that the warren report has the whole story. because of the conspiracy theorists, we ve put this case under a high-powered microscope, splitting hairs and then proceeding to split the split hairs. the kennedy case is now the most complex murder case by far in world histo
theorists who have put this case under a high-powered microscope, splitting hairs and then proceeding to split the split hairs. the kennedy case is now the most complex murder case by far in world history. nothing even remotely comes close. we are left with the series of real and critical questions about the assassination. questions which have not been answered to the satisfaction of the people of the united states. when president kennedy was killed, he was not killed by one man. he was shot from a number of different directions by different guns. the story has been suppressed. witnesses have been killed. and this is your country. we aren t trying to hide a thing from you or from mr. epstein or mr. lane or the world. we are laying it all out. that s right here in the notes of testimony. and if we have transposed in error a possibly into a probably, then we are delighted to have you point it out to us. but you can do so only because we ve laid it on the line.
you were not engaging in sexual activity with ms. lewinsky during the deposition, that the statement of mr. bennett might be literally true? no, sir. i mean that at the time of the deposition, it had been.that was well beyond any point of improper contact between me and ms. lewinsky. it did more to damage his image than anything throughout the entire process. the use of the word is might have a perfectly appropriate legal defense in a brief written by his lawyer. but it was not the right way to approach testimony in front of a grand jury that would be seen by the whole world. he knew that there was a lot of evidence about it and that he was left really to sort of split hairs with the meaning of the word is. it would become the defining moment of the entire ordeal.