he s trying to capitalize on this. absolutely. and what republicans are trying to do is sort of split hairs and make a distinction between what he s saying about representative omar s policy positions, things she s said about the united states, things she s said about israel, that she has said she regrets, and anything racist or xenophobic. it s not a distinction he made in the original tweet. it s not a distinction he s been careful about. there s a sense that he s deliberately clouding the lines here and you do stoke real hostility in his crowds towards women of color. i wilhan omar, the scrutiny t her tweets have gotten, she s gotten a lot, she have not been received warmly because she has trafficked in anti-semitic tropes. to hear him say these are vile expressions of hers, i think it s important to point out that he has trafficked in anti-semitic tropes as a
now he s just one among a growing band of doubters. their books and articles are on the newsstands, they re in the supermarkets. now according to a recent poll, only one in three americans remains convinced that the warren report has the whole story. because of the conspiracy theories, who have put this case under a high-powered microscope, splitting hairs and then proceeding to split the split hairs. the kennedy case is now the most complex murder case by far in world history. nothing even remotely comes close. the warren report said that lee harvey oswald shot the president from his window in the texas school book depository. three years after kennedy s assassination, the major question is still a simple one. did the warren commission, with all that time and all these resources, get its answers right? tonight, we ll go over those arguments one by one, area by area. as the assassination was taking
activity with ms. lewinsky during the deposition, that the statement of mr. bennett might be literally true? no, sir. i mean that at the time of the deposition, it had been.that was well beyond any point of improper contact between me and ms. lewinsky. it did more to damage his image than anything throughout the entire process. the use of the word is might have a perfectly appropriate legal defense in a brief written by his lawyer. but it was not the right way to approach testimony in front of a grand jury that would be seen by the whole world. he knew that there was a lot of evidence about it and that he was left really to sort of split hairs with the meaning of the word is. it would become the defining moment of the entire ordeal. people remember the sound
activity with ms. lewinsky during the deposition, that the statement of mr. bennett might be literally true? no, sir. i mean that at the time of the deposition, it had been.that was well beyond any point of improper contact between me and ms. lewinsky. it did more to damage his image than anything throughout the entire process. the use of the word is might have a perfectly appropriate legal defense in a brief written by his lawyer. but it was not the right way to approach testimony in front of a grand jury that would be seen by the whole world. he knew that there was a lot of evidence about it and that he was left really to sort of split hairs with the meaning of the word is. it would become the defining moment of the entire ordeal. people remember the sound
if it is legal it has nothing to do with as we mentioned earlier, you can find out how to dispose of a body, it is illegal. you can find ahow to make a bomb , it is illegal. the information is still out there. and that is all we are talking about. reading information. not talking about actually creating. it is not creating this at all. arthel: you say this is a good idea or not? i think it is illegal. less split hairs per the actual blueprint will not you build an undetectable gun because it requires components that are detectable. it is largely undetectable but does require metal components arthel: let me ask you this , do you have to register these guns? you have to have a background check? that is the issue. because if someone can make one of these guns, it is not registrable. it is easy to hide. the issue is, if you make one of the guns, you are already breaking the law because under the 1988 act you already breaking the law.