mrjohnson said the findings were rubbish and a lie and said to reach this deranged conclusion, the committee had been obliged to say a series of things that were patently absurd, and it was a dreadful day for mps and democracy. he does have some supporters who share his view. i think it is spiteful, vindictive, overreaching, quite frankly. this is a completely unfair report as borisjohnson says, it feels very much like a stitch up. in terms of due process, i don t think he has been treated fairly at all. saying he has deliberately misled the house, how can they possibly come to that conclusion? where is the evidence? i have not seen any. i will be speaking against this, voting against this and i hope other colleagues do as well. call a general election. the leader of the house said that vote would happen on monday. it will be a painful process and a sad process. all of us must do what we think
honourable thing and had a bit of humility and apologised to the british humility and apologised to the british public not only a lawbreaker but a liar. british public not only a lawbreaker but a liar.- british public not only a lawbreaker but a liar. last week he announced lawbreaker but a liar. last week he announced he lawbreaker but a liar. last week he announced he was lawbreaker but a liar. last week he announced he was resigning, - announced he was resigning, attacking the committee as a kangaroo court. i attacking the committee as a kangaroo court. attacking the committee as a kanuaroo court. , ., , , kangaroo court. i swear by almighty god. kangaroo court. i swear by almighty god- and kangaroo court. i swear by almighty god. and serious kangaroo court. i swear by almighty god. and serious content, - kangaroo court. i swear by almighty god. and serious content, the - god. and serious content, the committee god. and serious content, the committee said,
as a kangaroo court. i resigning, attacking the committee as a kangaroo court. resigning, attacking the committee as a kangaroo court. i swear by god. in other serious as a kangaroo court. i swear by god. in other serious contempt as a kangaroo court. i swear by god. in other serious contempt which - in other serious contempt which would ve significantly increased the recommended suspension to 90 days. in the statement, mrjohnson said the findings were. he does have some supporters who share his view. i he does have some supporters who share his view. share his view. i think it is spiteful. share his view. i think it is spiteful, vindictive - share his view. i think it is spiteful, vindictive and - spiteful, vindictive and overreaching, quite frankly. this is a completely unfair report and boris johnson a completely unfair report and boris johnson since this is very much like a stewardship in terms of doing that, a stewardship in terms of doing that, i a stewardship in ter
anybody who criticises his actions when a decent public servant would have done the honourable thing, would have had a little bit of humility, and would have apologised to the british public for what they put them through. the to the british public for what they put them through. to the british public for what they put them through. the report also criticises boris put them through. the report also criticises boris johnson s - put them through. the report also | criticises boris johnson s behaviour criticises borisjohnson s behaviour recently, last week he announced he was resigning, attacking the committee is a kangaroo court. another serious contempt, the committee says, which would have seriously increased the recommended suspension to 90 days. in a statement, mrjohnson said the findings were rubbish and a lie and set in order to reach this deranged conclusion, the committee have been obliged to see a series of things that repeatedly absurd and that it was a dreadful day for mps
see through this act, this clown act that he puts on. it is pretty obvious that report is damning as to what happened. and he has disgraced himself. he should apologise to the british people. and rishi sunak shouldn t have popped up for as long as he has, the british public should not be paying for the lawbreaker and the liar for his legal defence when he has not got a defence when he s bang to rights and what he s done. that was deputy labour leader angela rayner with her reaction. let s get some more reaction. i am joined by brendan clark smith, conservative mp. andyjohnson supporter. what sort of argument can you make today? i think we are absolutely appalled. this seems very vindictive, very spiteful, this seems very vindictive, very spiteful, and i would say a complete overreach spiteful, and i would say a complete overreach. 90 days and taking summary s pass off them is the equivalent of putting somebody in the stocks and touring them around the stocks and touring them around