since then has also made comments and hasn t recused himself. again, in a court of law you wouldn t get it. there are other things that have come out since. i would say this is very unfair. i think it has gone beyond its remit. the metropolitan police, of course, only issued that one fine, which many people disagreed with, to borisjohnson and rishi sunak at the time. but the committee seem to be talking beyond face and almost really as though examining the law. that was not the remit. , examining the law. that was not the remit, , ., , remit. so, ust to put it quite clearl remit. so, just to put it quite clearly and remit. so, just to put it quite clearly and plainly, remit. so, just to put it quite clearly and plainly, to - remit. so, just to put it quite clearly and plainly, to your i remit. so, just to put it quite - clearly and plainly, to your mind, what is borisjohnson s defence? boris johnson s defence what is borisjohnson s defence? borisjohnson s defence is very boris joh
see through this act, this clown act that he puts on. it is pretty obvious that report is damning as to what happened. and he has disgraced himself. he should apologise to the british people. and rishi sunak shouldn t have popped up for as long as he has, the british public should not be paying for the lawbreaker and the liar for his legal defence when he has not got a defence when he s bang to rights and what he s done. that was deputy labour leader angela rayner with her reaction. let s get some more reaction. i am joined by brendan clark smith, conservative mp. andyjohnson supporter. what sort of argument can you make today? i think we are absolutely appalled. this seems very vindictive, very spiteful, this seems very vindictive, very spiteful, and i would say a complete overreach spiteful, and i would say a complete overreach. 90 days and taking summary s pass off them is the equivalent of putting somebody in the stocks and touring them around the stocks and touring them around
conservative on both sides on this. from conservative mps on both sides on this. from conservative mps there i on both sides on this. from conservative mps there is l on both sides on this. from conservative mps there is a on both sides on this. from - conservative mps there is a distinct sense of uncomfortable nervous about this. this has raised a difficult issue that many feel doesn t look too good and they are concerned. some are concerned about whether action should have been taken sooner, whether mr zahawi should sooner, whether mr za hawi should have sooner, whether mr zahawi should have sorted things out sooner, why he left it so long, whether rishi sunak should have acted decisively as soon as this came out. others are saying, there is an ethics adviser that rishi sunak appointed, there had been a gap after the last one resigned under borisjohnson. he should be allowed to look into this. the labour party saying that this is more of the same of what we have seen before and t
digby has answers to this, which, as i think digby has very fairly pointed out, there digby has very fairly pointed out, there are digby has very fairly pointed out, there are not. find digby has very fairly pointed out, there are not. there are not. and one of the consequences there are not. and one of the consequences is there are not. and one of the consequences is on there are not. and one of the consequences is on the - there are not. and one of the consequences is on the front| there are not. and one of the l consequences is on the front of there are not. and one of the - consequences is on the front of the daily telegraph at their head digby saying an ambulance is unlikely if you fall, they are told with the strikes expected to the paramedics and 99 workers curtailing the call outs. this is going to have a huge knock on effect for anybody needing emergency treatment. yes. huge knock on effect for anybody needing emergency treatment. yes, i would ust needing emergen