given the fact that they have already indicted the president and his coconspirator walt nauta, and they got a big january 6th indictment that may be coming down the pike in, oh, the next ten business days. yeah. do you find that evidence of anything remarkably aggressive in the doj s wheel house? i think it is different than the way that doj typically conduct business. oftentimes, the doj will either indict or seek a plea deal first against lower level offenders, and in an attempt to flip those people yeah and then they will bring charges against the pink king pin. here, doj seems to be adopting an opposite approach. we are going to almost open our come mono and show you through this very detailed speaking indictment all the things we know. we are going to show you what we know from people s tax. we are going to show you what we know from surveillance footage. we are going to show you what we know from testimony. it is really an impressive compendium of their investigat
subpoenaing people. but the fact that he is still looking at, focused on this sort of wheels in the machine, the cogs in the machine, the lower level staffers who were party to, allegedly, trump s plot to hide these classified documents, is interesting to me and a testament to the special counsel s tenacity in all this, given the fact that they have already indicted the president and his coconspirator walt nauta, and they got a big january 6th indictment that may be coming down the pike in, oh, the next ten business days. yeah. do you find that evidence of anything remarkably aggressive in the doj s wheel house? i think it is different than the way that doj typically conduct business. oftentimes, the doj will either indict or seek a plea deal first against lower level offenders, and in an attempt to flip those people yeah and then they will bring charges against the pink king pin. here, doj seems to be adopting an opposite approach. we are going to almost open our come
and we have got him with this drawback. he s got to pull the hammer and pull the trigger in order for that gun to shoot. am i correct? you are correct. judge jeanine: we don t know what the role of alec baldwin here. but isn t he involved in the hiring of security and safety? not necessarily. sometimes that falls to a line producer. he may not have been involved. judge jeanine: what about the fact in the eyes of law enforcement, they have three people at the very least in their within their sight. and there is a crime of negligent possession of a gun, i believe. it s a misdemeanor in new mexico. who could get charged with that, spike in. i believe the armorer could get charged, the first a.d.
and we have got him with this drawback. he s got to pull the hammer and pull the trigger in order for that gun to shoot. am i correct? you are correct. judge jeanine: we don t know what the role of alec baldwin here. but isn t he involved in the hiring of security and safety? not necessarily. sometimes that falls to a line producer. he may not have been involved. judge jeanine: what about the fact in the eyes of law enforcement, they have three people at the very least in their within their sight. and there is a crime of negligent possession of a gun, i believe. it s a misdemeanor in new mexico. who could get charged with that, spike in. i believe the armorer could get charged, the first a.d.
and we have got him with this drawback. he s got to pull the hammer and pull the trigger in order for that gun to shoot. am i correct? you are correct. judge jeanine: we don t know what the role of alec baldwin here. but isn t he involved in the hiring of security and safety? not necessarily. sometimes that falls to a line producer. he may not have been involved. judge jeanine: what about the fact in the eyes of law enforcement, they have three people at the very least in their within their sight. and there is a crime of negligent possession of a gun, i believe. it s a misdemeanor in new mexico. who could get charged with that, spike in. i believe the armorer could get charged, the first a.d.