tell us what else you ve learned. i mean, i think it s significant especially the photos yout discussed last hou that show just how this was organized. i think a key part of this is essentially them not trusting the trump team because after they had that initial grand jury subpoena that was delivered, you had this filing that was signed by a trump lawyer, name is redacted in this latest filing, so weis don t know based on the filing who it was, but has been reported publicly about this trump lawyercl said there was n responsive documents left. lo and behold when they went and executed the search warrant there were allec these document left. so there s still information we don t know about how they got the source of that information. but the key part of it is that they were right. we can see by the product what they were able to seize from donald trump s mar-a-lago facilityag down there that the information they had about himt continuing to hold onat to classified informatio
justice piece of this that you and i have talked about really demonstrates intent. that s such an important thing because it s hard to prove intent. andrew knows this from his white collar work. it s hard to get the ceo. but when the ceo lies or shreds documents or misleads investigators, that suddenly becomes easier. there s still a whole bunch of work for investigators to do and a whole bunch of people the fbi will need to interview, including possibly, quite likely, mr. trump s lawyers in this very case. i agree with andrew that they have at least become witnesses. but all that said, stephanie, he s not a president. and those special rules don t apply. he is now a former president. and he has the same authority as you and i. he can t retain classified information. he doesn t even have a security clearance. the records are not his. they belong to the national archives and the american