Bngsing and wor with segregationist senators s on wednesdaator Elizabeth Warren who is the only candidate polling in double digits on stage held strong in the first partof the debate. Many are calling Julian Castro the breakout star of the first night. Joining me is the senior Political Writer f the San Francisco chronicle and los angeles political timesin write g us. Much anticipated two nights of debates. Were going toet into the details of those Heated Exchanges in a moment. F,first do you think the fundamental tenor of this race has changed this week . Absolutely. I think we saw some exchanges between these candidates,r cularly between Kamala Harris and joe biden that this is a pivotal momentt i race. Theres such a long time to go. We have more than 200 days until the iowa caucuses. L did thst two nights determine anything . No. Did it decide who the nomineeis going to be . No. But these exchanges,cu parrly the Heated Exchange between Kamala Harris and joe biden over race is goi to
Doctrine or keep it. Custice roberts well hear argument first this morning in case 221219, relentless versus the department commerce. Mr. Martinez. Or aument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicialss and undermined statutory interpretation. It should be overror three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Article iii emwe judges to say what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal statutes using their best and iepdent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates ieretive authority from courts to agenciesanit forces courts to adopt inferior agency constructions that aued for political or policy reasons. In so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and enures agency overreach. And by removing key checks o executive power, it threatens individual liber. Chevron also violates the apa. The most s
Jimmy thank you, everybody. Thank you very much. Very nice. Thank you, cleto. Thanks, thanks. I feel rested. I feel more alive than the bing a. I. Chatbot. [ laughter ] joe biden did not get president s day off. He made a surprise visit to ukraine instead. And while typically surprises and 80 yearolds arent a great combination [ laughter ] this one worked out. President zelensky was happy to see him. You can see it was emotional. And they must have been working on this for a while, because take a look at the video here. They were out walking on the street, not something we typically see with zelenskyy. They honored our president with a plaque on what they call the walk of the brave. Which is a very prestigious distinction. Only one other american has been enshrined on that street, weird al yankovic. [ laughter and applause ] very big over there, huge, actually. And then biden jumped on a train for a ten hour ride to warsaw where he greeted yet another surprised and enthusiastic group.
Doctrine or keep it. Chief Justice Roberts we hear argument first this morning ase 221219, relentless versus the department of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of roman marti on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief e, and may it please the court for too long, chevron has distorted the judicial process and undermined statutory interpretation it should be overruled for three ass. First, chevron violates the constitution article iii empowers judges to what the law is. It requires them to interpret federal ates using their best and independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reallocates interpretive auory from courts to to adopt inferior agencycourts constructions that are issued fotical or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as faithful agents of cong it mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key checks on executive power, it threatens individual liberty. Chevron allates the apa. The most straightforward
Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this mni in case 221219, relentless versus the dept of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please tht for too long, chevron has distorted the dial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should orruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Articliiempowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to int federal statutes using their be a independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reall Interpretive Authority from courts to es, and it forces courts to adopt inferior Agency Construction are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as fl agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key ec on executive power, it threatens individuerty. Chevron also violates the apa. The most straighrd reading of section 706 re