lawrence? lawrence: the second hour of fox & friends starts right now and, remember, mornings are better with friends. steve: all right a fox news alert, t three hours, 10:00 easn time the supreme court will hear oral arguments on colorado s decision to kick former president donald trump off the state s primary ballot. brian: the high court in unchartered territory legal territory as justices wrestle with an historic election dispute. ainsley: lucas tomlinson joins us with the latest. good morning, steve, ainsley, and brian. the supreme court has never heard a case like this before in its history. oral arguments begin in less than three hours, as steve said, in protest of the former leading g.o.p. candidate. fencing has been erected outside the nation s top court near the u.s. capitol as you can see here. colorado kicked trump off the ballot citing the constitution insurrection clause section 3 of the 14th amendment to be specific, which has never been used in
one thing in private, and saw him say something else to the american people. and i think that s an indictment of the anti republican conference, but it also speaks to why donald trump is willing to continue to elevate kevin mccarthy, until somebody steps in his stance. look, given mccarthy was born, believing it was gonna be speaker of the house. and nothing will stop him, but for one person, who is donald trump. if donald trump would withdraws his support of kevin mccarthy, he lose his second speakership, the first happened in 2015, the next one could happen next january. and here is the most disheartening think for kevin mccarthy, danielle. and that same wall street journal, trump refused to answer directly, when asked if he supported mccarthy for speaker. so, if republicans took control of the house in november, while some republicans have come out and support mccarthy, you have representative matt gates floating the idea of how congressman jim jordan is a possible future speaker.
republican conference, but it also speaks to why donald trump is willing to continue to elevate kevin mccarthy, until somebody steps in his stance. look, given mccarthy was born, believing it was gonna be speaker of the house. and nothing will stop him, but for one person, who is donald trump. if donald trump would withdraws his support of kevin mccarthy, he lose his second speakership, the first happened in 2015, the next one could happen next january. and here is the most disheartening think for kevin mccarthy, danielle. and that same wall street journal, trump refused to answer directly, when asked if he supported mccarthy for speaker. so, if republicans took control of the house in november, while some republicans have come out and support mccarthy, you have representative matt gates floating the idea of how congressman jim jordan is a possible future speaker. and it raises the question, is this the future of the republican party s leadership, when you have jim jordan s name bein
ridiculous as this in a debate, somebody steps. there are points to be made that the wall is not sufficient and you have to go beyond that but this is nonsense, gillibrand. the border patrol officials, i.c.e. officials, there s a 53,000, individuals, in i.c.e. custody right now. they are appropriated for 4 a 5,000. they asked for more beds. they did not get it. but this whole blow tes protestd against i.c.e., i went out to one of the largest of 31 i.c.e. facilities in the country and they opened the doors to let them see what so many have deemed as concentration camps. take a look at this. acting director, where are we? we re currently in the intake processing center and this facility here houses up to 1,940 detainees after they get classified and booked in by the
white house about how we effectively respond getting our allies together to somehow figure out how to take care of this man and, again, i go back to it. it s not just barack obama who has been there. you were there and you were covering the white house when george w. bush made his infamous remark about this guy we just can t get our arms around politically. no. president bush was able to rely on putin because after 9/11, he had his back on terrorism and that actually, the administration policy gave putin something after pass in check knee ya and that was defined by 9:00. you re not hearing a lot from the white house or the administration on what the stakes are in ukraine and what the vision of the united states is. what are the priorities of the united states? yes, we have heard the president talk about consequences if somebody steps over the line. i m not sure what that means. we have heard the secretary of state, you know, condemning the attacks. but as you said before, this is not