i understand it, it is a whole thing. i know you are an artist. but what is to distinguish to from somebody saying, well, look, my mac and cheese in this restaurant is a work of art? this pie is a work of art. the way i make my clothing in this boutique, works of art. so you know what, i don t want somebody in here who s gay, who s black, who s jewish, who s disabled, what is the line that distinguishes you from the artist that somebody could, under the auspices of saying they an artist do the same thing? do you have those concerns? i can only speak to myself, and i may declare, i work with everyone. i find identifies lgbt. and what i m seeking is that the court step in to protect everyone s right to speak freely. the court has already determined these tests. every free speech case determines whether the speech or conduct. the law, is establish a term in that. it s a message being communicated. is getting media but we re used to seeing? words, text, graphics.
event is awful. but do you connect those things? look, i think that the problem that we have is that we live in a world where we are more connected than ever before. and also, so incredibly isolated by virtue of the events that we have made in technology. so how do you rectify those two things? how do you rectify somebody saying, i am uncomfortable with drag shows being exposed to children. but, at the same time saying that these are consenting adults who just wanted to enjoy a beard and now have been irreparably harmed for the rest of their lives. and what s the answer to that? and i think the hard truth this we don t really have all the answers. but we have to start by having, again, rigorous honesty with ourselves to understand completely that no person should be forced to carry this burden where they feel as if they can be safe not even within their own skin. all right, charlotte, one of the problems is that on social media people think that it is their community. in other
tweeted out these things, she had these inflammatory treats, and now she is saying that this event is awful, but do you connect those things? i think that the problem that we have is that we live in a world where we are more connected than ever before, and so incredibly isolated, by virtue of advancing technology. so, how do you rectify those two things? how do you rectify somebody saying that i m uncomfortable with shows being exposed to children, the same time saying these are consenting adults who just want to enjoy a beer and have now been directly harmed for the rest of their lives. what is the answer to that? we don t really have all the answers but we have to start by having rigorous honesty with ourselves, to understand, completely, that no person should be forced to carry this burden where they feel like they can t be safe even within
this one a lot of weather presenters? this one a lot of weather presenters? this one a lot of weather resenters? ., ., ., ., presenters? some of the information oane, presenters? some of the information online. some presenters? some of the information online. some of presenters? some of the information online, some of it presenters? some of the information online, some of it will presenters? some of the information online, some of it will have - presenters? some of the information online, some of it will have a - online, some of it will have a slight ring of truth, a slight believability. if you wrap little bits of facts in a narrative which is completely false in the end, people tend to have that little bit of belief. some people don t want to think about the world warming and the impact it could have. we all live in the uk here and we know the weather is very changeable, we want sunny days during the summer. you love that word. sunny days during the summer. you love that wo
to this person or to others that would allow law enforcement to remove guns from that person. a court would have to issue that order, and, of course, the subject can have the guns returned if they can prove over time they are not that threat. unless somebody was looking at this, saying we think this is a sign that this young man is an imminent threat and there was something else to support it, it seems a little unlikely red flag laws would have worked here. because remember, the uncle of this young man has said that he saw no sign of anything going wrong. he s just a quiet kid. nothing out there. very often red flag laws are triggered by overt measures. somebody saying i m going to kill you to the neighbor. threatening with a gun and waving it around. that s often what law enforcement is looking for in a case like this. here, again, the question is who knew about it? did anybody know about it? and did they take it conspiracily enough that they should have warned law enforcement ahead o