Mission of the sfpuc to provide water and Wastewater Service and do not benefit the individual rate pay er and policy expenditures if desirable and if necessary should be funded by the general Fund Departments whereas Community Benefit programs and other policy expenditures may have benefits to some interest groups, they do not benefit all rate pay ers whereas city rate payers have not bought into the value of these policies because there has not been a venue and aggregate costs of these programs therefore resolved strongly urging the puc Commission Policy expenditures and also on the cap program as you know the big horn desert California Supreme Court ruled in 206 that this type of program is illegal the city needs to ask the board of supervisors you do to fund these programs if you find that low income water rate payers need help it should not be put on the rest of the rate pay ers thank you. Thank you very much for being here lorraine. The next card and this is the last card i have
From Lorraine Lucas. Hi lorraine good afternoon. Happy earth day. Happy birthday . Earth day. Oh im Lorraine Lucas and the coalition voted at the april meeting the following resolution we represent 48 Neighborhood Organizations throughout the city whereas the programs included in the category of policy expenditures in both water and Wastewater Enterprises whereas the cost project tree and the 10year cash flow models is un sustainable 1 billion and 176 million and 569 thousand and 9 36 and together with annual payments related to debt in the next 10 years projected to increase 7 fold makes the cost of water and Wastewater Service prohibitive for the families of San Francisco whereas water and wastewater rates must adhere to the cost of Service Requirements of prop 218 of the state constitution, which requires property related fees and charges do not exceed the proportional cost of providing the service to the individual property. Whereas this proportional requirement is violated embedde
Proportional cost of providing the service to the individual property. Whereas this proportional requirement is violated embedded in rates not essential and not core to the mission of the sfpuc to provide water and Wastewater Service and do not benefit the individual rate pay er and policy expenditures if desirable and if necessary should be funded by the general Fund Departments whereas Community Benefit programs and other policy expenditures may have benefits to some interest groups, they do not benefit all rate pay ers whereas city rate payers have not bought into the value of these policies because there has not been a venue and aggregate costs of these programs therefore resolved strongly urging the puc Commission Policy expenditures and also on the cap program as you know the big horn desert California Supreme Court ruled in 206 that this type of program is illegal the city needs to ask the board of supervisors you do to fund these programs if you find that low income water rate
Proportional requirement is violated embedded in rates not essential and not core to the mission of the sfpuc to provide water and Wastewater Service and do not benefit the individual rate pay er and policy expenditures if desirable and if necessary should be funded by the general Fund Departments whereas Community Benefit programs and other policy expenditures may have benefits to some interest groups, they do not benefit all rate pay ers whereas city rate payers have not bought into the value of these policies because there has not been a venue and aggregate costs of these programs therefore resolved strongly urging the puc Commission Policy expenditures and also on the cap program as you know the big horn desert California Supreme Court ruled in 206 that this type of program is illegal the city needs to ask the board of supervisors you do to fund these programs if you find that low income water rate payers need help it should not be put on the rest of the rate pay ers thank you. Tha
Requires property related fees and charges do not exceed the proportional cost of providing the service to the individual property. Whereas this proportional requirement is violated embedded in rates not essential and not core to the mission of the sfpuc to provide water and Wastewater Service and do not benefit the individual rate pay er and policy expenditures if desirable and if necessary should be funded by the general Fund Departments whereas Community Benefit programs and other policy expenditures may have benefits to some interest groups, they do not benefit all rate pay ers whereas city rate payers have not bought into the value of these policies because there has not been a venue and aggregate costs of these programs therefore resolved strongly urging the puc Commission Policy expenditures and also on the cap program as you know the big horn desert California Supreme Court ruled in 206 that this type of program is illegal the city needs to ask the board of supervisors you do t