If not by funny can weigh in on social media. Istter http twitter. Com cspanwj. It also send us a email at journal cspan. Org. If you have not seen or read the republican pledge, please look at it. It is a very brief document from the rnc. It says i come in so and so, a firm that if they do not win the nomination, i will endorse the republican nominee regardless of who it is. I further pledge that i will not seek to run as an independent, write in candidate, nor will i seek or accept the nomination for president of any other party. That is it. Donald trump cited in new york. During the 1 00 hour yesterday. He was at a meeting with the head of the rnc. He came out it to a clock, donald trump did, he spoke to reporters. This is what he said. [video clip] justrump the chairman left, as you probably know. He has been extremely fair. The rnc has been extremely last twofor the months. I wanted fairness. I do not have to be treated any differently than anybody else. I just wanted fairness fro
Secure. We have to do that. The American People, we dont trust the government in washington, d. C. To actually do what they are saying. We see what is happening on the border right now and seat rules and laws already in place are not being obeyed, and so when donald trump talks the way he is talking and says these things, people appreciate that because they understand he is saying, yes, there is a real problem that were facing in this country with illegal immigration, and we have to solve this problem. A little more from the mammoth poll, donald trump leading in all demographics, and the poll here is very conservative, and tea party supporters, 36 , does that sound right to you . I would say so yes. By gender, 37 among men and 23 among women. There was a piece the other day that said the tea party is still trying to determine whether donald trump is its cup of tea and a play on words there. What is your broad thinking about donald trump at this point and your level of support for him .
For the review of supervisor cohens legislation regarding pdr conversion to office in landmark properties. Ultimately, during the discussion of the proposed legislation, the hpc continued the item until its october 2nd hearing. In the interim they are interested in providing a letter to this commission so you know some of the thoughts going on in their heads about how they believe the legislation could be more effective. Some of the questions they still have and staff is working on a response right now. They want to be as useful and possible to the Zoning Administrator as part of staff to this commission as the final deciders on whether or not this pdr should be converted to office. They do have some questions about process. They do want to have a better idea of whats expected to them and they discuss how they could provide some criteria so they are able to discuss the merits of proposals for buildings and how these buildings could be rehabilitated provided the pdr is converted to offi
Legislation regarding pdr conversion to office in landmark properties. Ultimately, during the discussion of the proposed legislation, the hpc continued the item until its october 2nd hearing. In the interim they are interested in providing a letter to this commission so you know some of the thoughts going on in their heads about how they believe the legislation could be more effective. Some of the questions they still have and staff is working on a response right now. They want to be as useful and possible to the Zoning Administrator as part of staff to this commission as the final deciders on whether or not this pdr should be converted to office. They do have some questions about process. They do want to have a better idea of whats expected to them and they discuss how they could provide some criteria so they are able to discuss the merits of proposals for buildings and how these buildings could be rehabilitated provided the pdr is converted to office. Like we said well be providing a
They intend on meeting over the next month and provide specific recommendations how the department and the commissions can implement some of the recommendations in the San Francisco Architectural Heritage white paper on cultural assets. We are happy to relay the information to this commission if the commission does want to participate in that committee. The hearing started with a meeting of the architectural review committee. They reviewed the design for the van ness brt, thats going to run in front of city hall and the portion located within the civic Center Landmark district. As you are probably aware the Historic Preservation commission as well as the Civic Design Review Committee of the Arts Commission reviewed the designs for the improvements and platforms proposed by sbrt. There is still Design Review meetings to take place before either committee or either commission make a final recommendation. Well keep you posted on those results. Ultimately, the commissioner, the Design Revi