We need a motion to recuse. Director heinicke. Motion to recuse. Second. All those in favor, say aye . Aye. You are recused. Members . Just a couple of questions for mr. Carr. Thank you. I think it looks like were setting a new standard for Community Outreach and this time we have loads of compliments for you and last time we had loads of compliments for jay robinson and thank to the Community Members who served on the board. That is wonderful. One clarifying question. Its just the speeding humps that will be voted on by the community and that will be voted by the street that the speed hump is on . Correct. Our guidelines and our policy is that concurrent with city approval, the final approval step for any speed hump is a straight democratic vote of the Housing Units on that block. So an Apartment Building with 16 unit, each of those 16 units gets one vote. A singlefamily home is one unit and they get one vote. So yes, the final approval of the speed humps and i believe there are 20 ei
From. Please recognize that we didnt get here you know, from anybodys particular choice or what has happened, but everything evolves. If you have got an iphone, you are constantly getting updates and using windows if you are using a computer, updates, things have to constantly change to keep pace with progress. So its important that well reevaluate the Transportation System and the best possible outcomes we can get is when they are informed by people like you, who are experienced and are taking transit on a regular basis. We need to make sure that we have all of the perspectives in consideration. I really want to suggest that staff do a good job of conveying the information. I really liked what director heinicke said, understanding why this is happening. When you are conveying information, make sure that people do understand the situation that we are in, and why its happening. You said early on in your presentation, that transportation is the key, the life blood of our city and a lot o
Have concerns. For instance, some of more significant measures will go to Detailed Design with direct input from the Fire Department and other stakeholders on the transportation advisory safety committee. I would like to talk a little bit about how this project was conceived. This was a communityrequested project. We looked at a compilation of trafficcalming requests from residents in the neighborhood. In advance of the total and during the planning process for this, we received 15 resident requests for trafficcalming within the project area. So something that residents definitely see as a priority in their neighborhood. Three Public Meetings, general Public Meetings were held for the project in the fall of 2011. And then again in the fall of 2013, as a followup, after the development of the proposal. The project area encompasss about 1600 households, whether they by apartments or stand alone houses. Our mailing list included three notices to those 1600 residences. From the resident po
This and thank you very much. Thank you, appreciate your participation in the committee. Next speaker, please. [ reading speakers names ] [ inaudible ] come forward, please. Good afternoon, sir. Thank you. My name is dan mckew and im a resident of the area that this particular matter concerns. I have live d there for 20 years with my family. You kind of thing you go into a neighborhood there. Pachenko street, the way people get from southeast San Francisco to the golden gate bridge. So what looks like a lazy street in the morning, in the afternoon becomes a circus. One afternoon i was driving home and parked in front of my house and a car came up behind me and stopped. A guy came out of the car and banged on my window. I talked to him and he says, dont park here. Now mind you this is in front of my house dont park here, go down the street and there is a parking place down the street that its easier that i can get by. So the first time that i was ever kicked out of parking in front of m
Bit about how this project was conceived. This was a communityrequested project. We looked at a compilation of trafficcalming requests from residents in the neighborhood. In advance of the total and during the planning process for this, we received 15 resident requests for trafficcalming within the project area. So something that residents definitely see as a priority in their neighborhood. Three Public Meetings, general Public Meetings were held for the project in the fall of 2011. And then again in the fall of 2013, as a followup, after the development of the proposal. The project area encompasss about 1600 households, whether they by apartments or stand alone houses. Our mailing list included three notices to those 1600 residences. From the resident population, we recruited a tenmember work group to develop this traffic calming plan, four from the forest Hills Association and four other members represented the up upper golden gate neighborhood eastern annex of forest hill neighborho