issue of pennsylvania democrat john fetterman s recovery from a stroke earlier this year? fetterman suffered the stroke on may 13, the friday before the tuesday may 17 primary election did not reveal it until two days after it occurred. when he did so he didn t share an underlying heart condition that required the implanting of a defibrillator, and we wish him god speed and he s worked hard to win the nomination and it s a shame that his health has become an issue. the polls suggest that fetterman s senate race over dr. mehmet oz has narrowed as the pennsylvania gubernatorial race has widened and while oz won multiple debates, fetterman agreed to only one. it will be october 25th after pennsylvanians have voted and it will last 60 minutes. fetterman was looking to run out the clock, a strategy in the 2020 election when biden stayed in delaware when trump barnstormed the nation and he counted on early balloting, but as oz continues to close the gap, fetterman may regret not ag
well, he was the he was the arsonist who refused to call the fire department, right? i mean, isn t that a fair analogy? he s the guy who stoked the whole thing and then sat back and watched it unfold on his flat screen television without li lifting a finger to stop those people from what they were doing. oratorically and it s not the same as a coup. trump s role in urging people is kind of at the level of affinity, and i think that this is where the whole january 6th investigation becomes kind of difficult. he kind of, like, felt their pain and he shared their opinions, but that doesn t render their opinions criminal. i think that i share your criticisms in the way they could have approached their onand done so in more of a traditional court confrontational style, but i think you soft peddle,
never turn down an interview opportunity. maybe you like the pictures, the national institute infectious disease had funded the wiv through mr. dan zac s nonprofit even if the funding didn t go direct to the research that caused the pandemic it s still problematic. that s the result when dr. fauci comes out and says it s not going to happen. everyone in the media says dr. fauci says it s not going to happen. his name is not donald trump so dr. fauci has to be right. now that there is no donald trump people are realizing we might as well look exactly what he is saying and what he is saying just does not stand up to the smell test, the scratch test, and no longer is he going to get soft peddle interviews. how can you though longer say dr. fauci, are you sure it s okay not to wear a mask? the bigger story who are you writing checks to and what was china doing with that money? how can you start with soft petal things of is it to come go a sports bar and stand next to somebody i don t kno
behind him. that percent an of the gop base that is 80%, 90% with president trump. regardless. you hear that consistently throughout and that is enough to allow for the president to sort of leverage and say what he says. and for the leadership, to have to go out and soft peddle. is that because the republican base you re talking about, that it will be with president trump. is the message to them anything you re hearing about russia, anything you re hearing from the democrats or the media, it is just people who are refusing to accept? whether we like it or not. the fake news narrative is now baked sow the thinking of a lot of voters out there. so i think it is a very dangerous place for the company to be in. now what is really and what is fake is this when something bad, something good happens, that is real. if the president doesn t like it, does he get on determine whether or not it is fake? that seems to be the pattern
after 100 years war, we re agreeing when you do inside the country is up to you. what you do attacking neighbors, community of nations will get involved. that kept relative peace. there have been terrible wars but kept relative peace for 500 years. that is the world community s red line. what you do inside your country we have to accept as civil war. when it comes to that is where the false red line, where we say if we don t act here iran will be empowered to attack israel. that is silly analogy, falls analogy people push for their own agenda. reality whether we interfere with syria s domestic use of chemical weapons during a civil war has no bearing whether we protect israel from iran. bill: in 15 seconds what o does he say tonight. he would have be able to talk a more soft peddle approach. he will hide behind congress and behind the international community. eventually, my prediction we ll kick this to the united nations.