Historic and they focus on justice marshals time at the naacp attorney trying the education related segregation cases such as around the board of education. This is hosted by the National Museum of African American history and culture. Good evening. My name is dear trey cross, director of programs at the National Museum of African American history and culture. It is my pleasure to welcome all of you to this Wonderful Program and introduce you to our discussion entitled, historically speaking, thurgood marshall. An evening with spencer crew and paul think women. Before we begin, let me also welcome our audience who is streaming the discussion through the museums you stream channel. A twitter handle this evening is hashtag historically speaking. We are also thrilled that this program will be broadcast via cspan book tv and will be aired at a later date. To begin, dr. Cruz compelling new biography introduces us to the constant battles for equality faced by African Americans through a stud
Discussion entitled, historically speaking, Thurgood Marshall, a life in American History, an evening with spencer crew and paul finkle man. Before we begin, let me also welcome our audience whos streaming the discussion through the museums you stream channel. Our twitter handle this evening is historicallyspeaking. We are also thrilled that this program will be broadcast via cspan book tv and will be aired at a later date. Through dr. Crews compelling new biography introduces us to the constant battles of equality faced by africanamericans through a study of Thurgood Marshalls extraordinary courage and his believe in the power of the law to change society. Thurgood marshall, a life in American History, follows his career from his youth in baltimore, maryland, to his days as a Supreme Court justice. Thurgood marshalls inspiring story illustrates how pervasive is racism in American Society and reveals the difficulty of the struggles of africanamericans to make progress against it. Throu
Model which was the Imperial College of london model which has been shown to be fundamentally flawed and they said ok lets take that as given and then lets look at lets kind of see what policies will save how many lives and they came up with us an astounding measure 1760000 wives which now by the way birch really no one believes that anyway thats what they said and then they took this value of a statistical life that economists talk about i can explain that a little more she wanted multiplied one by the other and while i got almost a trillion dollars in benefits and they said well lock downs are extremely costly but they are going to cost close to a trillion so therefore we should do it. Is was it an economic consideration rather than a moral or ideological one thats correct but by the way i should have said lockdowns let me just read you what they study they study combine the home isolation of suspect cases on koren 1000 of those living in the same household as suspect cases and socia
Seeking benefits in a sign that economic pain of this pandemic is far from over tax according to an analysis but the chamber of commerce in 59 minutes left of trading in the day. The city says the tax could yeah, tiny leg lower. Result in companies wanting to leave the city and, guys, its down 0. 4 . Not just here in San Francisco only two sectors, energy and but also in seattle. Theres a proposal to tax big staples in the green still coming up, Digital Finance businesses to pay for covid19 company sofi landing the number relief back to you. I mean, could it could eight spot on this years disruptive 50 list encourage companies to leave the well spee with anthony noto worst case, of course, is something that is structured this way is it could encourage formerly of twitter, Goldman Sachs, and the nfl about his Companies Companies to companys efforts to take on the get rid of some of the lower big banks. Were looking forward to that paid workers one. First of all, lets focus on the big st
Now one of the things that has been possible in me is that all of the call that 19 pandemic is that in many countries its economists spread merrily liberally minded economists who are very much in favor of the strictest possible while many it could mean all the just and other Public Health professionals are a forum or are reserved about such tools mashers how do you explain that. What i think it what economists did early on starting in march the reason university of chicago study was they took the most extreme. Model which was the Imperial College of london model which has been shown to be fundamentally flawed and they said ok lets take that as given and then lets look at lets kind of see what policies will save how many lives and they came up with us an astounding measure 1760000 wives which now by the way birch really no one believes that anyway thats what they said and then they took this value of a statistical life that economists talk about i can explain that a little more she was